« Mesh Wi-Fi Checks In |
Main
| Wi-Fi on Airplanes: Clearing the Air »
December 16, 2004
Lower-Orbit Satellite or Hot Air?
Posted by John Yunker
According to The Economist a company out of Atlanta, Georgia plans to launch an "airship satellite" stationed 13 miles off the ground to function as a cost-effective low-orbit satellite.

This "stratellite" certainly appears to be less expensive than the real low-orbit satellite WildBlue which is coming on line in 2005.
The airship could be used to light up cities with DSL-like bandwidth. At 13 miles, I suspect latency will be an issue. But it certainly is a convenient way of manufacturing the tallest tower in town and would make a nice platform for fixed wireless base stations. Perhaps TowerStream would be interested in such a service.
Thanks Chris for the heads up.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: WiMAX & Fixed Wireless
- RELATED ENTRIES
- testing
- Palm Treo Litigation Update
- Class Action Suit Against Palm: Where Do I Sign Up?
- "Are you alright?" Cell calls spike in wake of London terrorist bombings
- 26.4 million Live 8 Text Messages? So What?
- It, Robot: "Shuushi, touzoku!!
- Remote medic alert was science fiction.. I said *was*
- I'll take a pass on NFL highlights to my cell
1. Jesse Kopelman on December 17, 2004 6:11 PM writes...
WildBlue is geosynchronous, not LEO. The difference being 200ms latency vs. 10ms. Iridium was a LEO constellation.
Permalink to Comment2. Jesse Kopelman on December 17, 2004 6:17 PM writes...
BTW, 13 miles high will hardly cause a latency issue. Even if the cell had a radius of 100 miles, you are talking 1ms latency due to propagation.
Permalink to Comment