Corante

About this Author
Derek Lowe
Derek Lowe, an Arkansan by birth, got his BA from Hendrix College and his PhD in organic chemistry from Duke before spending time in Germany on a Humboldt Fellowship on his post-doc. He's worked for several major pharmaceutical companies since 1989 on drug discovery projects against schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, osteoporosis and other diseases. To contact Derek email him directly: derekb.lowe@gmail.com Twitter: Dereklowe

Chemistry and Pharma Blogs:
The Science Business
Org Prep Daily
Kilomentor
On Pharma
Kinase Pro
Chemical Quantum Images
The LouRoe
One in Ten Thousand
Periodic Tabloid
Chemical Musings
C&E News Blog
Chemiotics II
Noel O'Blog
In Vivo Blog
Chirality
BBSRC/Douglas Kell
Drug Discovery Opinion
The Chemblog
Realizations in Biostatistics
Heterocyclic Chemistry Blog
Molecule of the Day
Chemjobber
WSJ Health Blog
PK/PD
Social Detritus
ChemSpider Blog
Node in the Noosphere
Pharmagossip
Organometallic Current
Useful Chemistry
Great Molecular Crapshoot
No Name No Slogan
Post Doc Ergo Propter Doc
SimBioSys
Culture of Chemistry
The Curious Wavefunction
Chemical Sabbatical
Totally Synthetic
Molecular Philosophy
Zusammen
Pharma's Cutting Edge
My Chemical Journey
The F- Blog
Chemical Professionals
Generally Chemistry
Chemistry World Blog
Eigenfunction/Eigenvalue
Synthesizing Ideas
Carbon-Based Curiosities
Business|Bytes|Genes|Molecules
Eye on FDA
Sigma-Aldrich ChemBlogs
Peter Murray-Rust
Chemical Forums
Depth-First
Curly Arrow
ChemCafe
Power of Goo
Fetz the Chemist
Carbon Tet
Chemical Crosspatch
Sceptical Chymist
Atomchuxky
Lamentations on Chemistry
Computational Organic Chemistry
Mining Drugs
Henry Rzepa
Making Graphite Work
Realm of Organic Synthesis
Liquid Carbon
Pharma Blog Review


Science Blogs and News:
The Loom
Uncertain Principles
Fierce Biotech
Blogs for Industry
Omics! Omics!
Young Female Scientist
Notional Slurry
Life of a Lab Rat
Nobel Intent
SciTech Daily
Is This Thing On?
Science Blog
Eastern Blot
FuturePundit
Flags and Lollipops
Aetiology
Gene Expression (I)
Gene Expression (II)
Sciencebase
Pharyngula
Adventures in Ethics and Science
Terra Sigillata
Transterrestrial Musings
Slashdot Science
A Scientist's Life
Living the Scientific Life
Humans in Science
Speculist
Science, Shrimp and Grits
Cosmic Variance
The Capsule
Zeroth Order Approximation
Science Library Blog
Biology News Net


Medical Blogs
Med Tech Sentinel
DB's Medical Rants
Science-Based Medicine
GruntDoc
The Health Care Blog
Respectful Insolence
Black Triangle
Diabetes Mine


Economics and Business
Marginal Revolution
Arnold Kling
The Volokh Conspiracy
Knowledge Problem
The Stalwart


Politics / Current Events
Virginia Postrel
Tinkerty Tonk
Instapundit
Megan McArdle
Mickey Kaus
Colby Cosh
Alien Corn
No Watermelons


Belles Lettres
Two Blowhards
Critical Mass
Arts and Letters Daily
God of the Machine
Armavirumque
About Last Night
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

In the Pipeline

« No Coming Attractions Here | Main | Two Days Off (From This, Anyway) »

September 20, 2004

Drug Development: The Current Odds

Email This Entry

Posted by Derek

The August issue of Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery has an alarming article on the attrition rates in drug development. I often get questions about these figures, and it's good to have a fresh look at the data. Among the ten largest pharma companies, in the period 1991-2000, here's the breakdown:

38% of the drugs taken in the the clinic dropped out in Phase I (safety / blood levels.)
60% of those remaining failed in Phase II (basic efficacy.)
40% of the remaining candidates failed in Phase III (big, expensive efficacy.)
And 23% of the ones that made it through the clinic failed to be approved by the FDA.

You can do the math as quickly as I can: that translates to about a 11% success rate from starting in the clinic. And consider that for someone like me, back in the research labs, a successful program is one that makes it to Phase I. It's no wonder that so few medicinal chemists have ever worked on a drug that's made it all the way to market!

The other thing to keep in mind, in light of last Friday's post, is that the money spent on these things grows terribly along the way. A failure in Phase I isn't pretty, considering the time and money spend in the preclinical period (aka: what I spend all my working life doing.) But a failure in Phase III or at FDA time is a financial disaster.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drug Development


COMMENTS

1. hound on September 20, 2004 12:02 PM writes...

You would thiunk that would translate into a huge market for some software which could help screen the efficacy according to molecular structure of the drug and the target enzyme or metabolite.

Permalink to Comment

2. Derek Lowe on September 20, 2004 1:46 PM writes...

Yes indeed. There has been a huge amount of money and effort dropped over the years on attempts to do just that, from which one can infer that it ain't easy. To pick an analogy from another industry, there would be a huge market for a method to forecast interest rate swings, too, but no one's come up with that one, either.

You'd think that drug development would be more amenable to such a technological fix, though, and I think that it is. But that just makes it a hideously difficult problem, rather than an impossible one. The first outfit that can truly screen out losers in silico, either on the basis of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or toxicology, will be able to name their price.

Permalink to Comment

3. jeet on September 21, 2004 5:20 PM writes...

these numbers wouldn't surprise anyone who is involved in late stage clinical development, product in-licensing or the financial community.

I view it as part of the reason why drugs are priced so much higher than costs (usually). Part of the cost is the "failure cost" of all the other molecules that you paid for but have 0 return, another part is how the inherent difficulty and long, long product development times set up a very effective barrier to entry.

I don't believe that the industry has much, if any, monopoly power. If you have a drug that is sucessful every other drug company in the world is allowed to launch competitors, target the same doctors, target the same consumers and target the same payers that the orignial company targets. Of course this is easier said than done.

There has been a lot of different efforts to increase the sucess rates in various phases with both software and other technologies. Every one starts with the promise, but usually ends with an incremental increase in knowledge. That's pretty much the story with the entire industry (and science in general really).

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Dealing With Hedgehog Screening Results
Animal Rights, You Say?
Blogroll Update
Pharma's Return on Investment: Yikes
How A Real Drug Industry Project Meeting Goes
Ghostwriting
Just Give It to NIH
How Not To Do It: The Secret Patent Decoder Ring