Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Don't Miss The DrugSafetyHub, a new blog on counterfeit drugs and the evolution of the pharma industry

Moore's Lore

« File Hoarding 1.0 Proves Bad Business | Main | The Google Bubble »

January 05, 2006

Is Otellini Changing Intel Quickly Enough?

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

intel%20new%20logo.jpgWhen Paul Otellini was named the CEO of Intel last year, he promised major changes.

As the first non-engineer to rise to the top at the chipmaker, he said he would push platforms, and communications, and low power, and change the corporate culture. He would also push more product internationally, and put consumer products (not just ingredients) under the Intel brand.

Whether he is moving rapidly enough remains an open question.

There are enormous claims of movement this week at CES, where Intel built a booth that would have made its former Comdex managers blush, and changed its slogan besides. But is Intel really leading? Or is it following?

Intel needs to be defining new platforms, based on families of chips. This week, all it's doing is the same-old same-old.

Oh, and word to the media.

Intel Inside wasn't Intel's logo. It was its "ingredient brand," under which payments were made to PC makers who included the logo on their advertising. Intel paid part of the PC industry's ad budget in order to get its name on the ads. That program is ending, to be replaced by a pure corporate ad campaign under the "Leap Ahead" tagline.

Now is when Intel should be coming forward with a unified vision. Otellini's speech should have gotten the headlines Gates got. Instead, it was second best. That's not good.

But we'll see. Jury's still out. Otellini has done some smart things, like bring Eric Kim over from Samsung as chief marketing officer. Intel is also a huge company. Much of the work Intel needs to do is in Washington, and in other world capitals, freeing up spectrum for Wi-Fi, WiMax, and other new communication technologies. It will take real innovation to bust that logjam. Maybe Otellini has it.

I hope so.

Comments (2) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: 802.11 | Always On | Business Strategy | Consumer Electronics | Futurism | Investment | Moore's Lore | Semiconductors


COMMENTS

1. Chris on January 5, 2006 12:48 PM writes...

For what it's worth, I was very impressed with Otellini when he was onstage at Apple's WWDC. He was the only speaker there capable of holding his own with Steve Jobs: he projects charisma, charm, confidence. And not a sleazeball.

I'm wary of putting marketing types in leadership positions at companies fundamentally bound to the quality of their engineering (look what's happened to GM), but I'm willing to give this one the benefit of the doubt.

Permalink to Comment

2. Jesse Kopelman on January 5, 2006 02:12 PM writes...

Why is changing the logo such an essential strategic move? Seems like it will benefit the marketing guy who came up with the plan and the company that gets paid $20M for the new logo, but not Intel . . .

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/24622

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack