Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moores Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moores Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moores Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesnt apply. In this blog well take a daily look at new implications of Moores Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
The market understands Moore's Law. It sees through the Bells' rhetoric.
The market understands that the three-year, replaceable property of a wireless network is a better economic bet than the 30-year old depreciation schedules the Bells must keep.
The market votes with its dollars, and those with a Clue follow.
AllTel, in Little Rock, has been accused of many things over the years, but stupidity is not one of them. So look here. They are dumping their wireline business and becoming a wireless outfit. It's all being spun-off to some schlubs in Texas, and even though AllTel shareholders will own 85% of the resulting firm the meaning here is clear -- sell it.
I have been writing ever since I came here (before actually) that Moore's Law means wireless, that wires don't work economically. Do you really need more proof? If you own stock in BellSouth, in Verizon, or in SBC (excuse me, AT&T) sell it.
1. Jesse Kopelman on December 9, 2005 06:13 PM writes...
On one hand, I find your position too extreme. After all, there needs to be some wires (long haul high traffic applications) out there. One the other hand, maybe you are not going far enough. Thanks to the packet revolution, services are now network indifferent. You don't need to own the network to provide a service on it. This indicates that in the end the owning of network infrastructure can never be a growth business. Perhaps you should be writing that owning your own network is so 20th century.
1. Jesse Kopelman on December 9, 2005 06:13 PM writes...
On one hand, I find your position too extreme. After all, there needs to be some wires (long haul high traffic applications) out there. One the other hand, maybe you are not going far enough. Thanks to the packet revolution, services are now network indifferent. You don't need to own the network to provide a service on it. This indicates that in the end the owning of network infrastructure can never be a growth business. Perhaps you should be writing that owning your own network is so 20th century.
Permalink to Comment