Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moores Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moores Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moores Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesnt apply. In this blog well take a daily look at new implications of Moores Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
I just spent several hours working (free) for a friend, tearing through and reviewing several dozen blogs he thought were pretty good. (That's George Reeves, at right.)
This helped me a great deal. I learned a lot about what I like to see in a blog, and what I don't like to see.
Let's start with what I like to see:
Good thoughtful writing.
Unpredictability.
The feeling that there's a person there.
Availability of comments.
An RSS feed that at least tells me what I need to know about an item before it's truncated because they're looking for ad revenue.
Some reporting that involves more than a hotlink would be nice.
This is part of what's wrong with corporate blogging. Whether it's an executive blog, a publisher blog, or a product blog, it's just too predictable. The writing is often so strait-jacketed (in order to make it replicable and corporate-approved) that the life is knocked out of it.
Blogging is a very human activity. So is reading blogs. Given that general topics such as "politics" or "technology" are going to result in a lot of coverage of the same things, it helps if the writer has a unique take. There better be someone home. Talking points, whether corporate or political, are a waste of my time.
Which leads me to what I don't want to see in blogs:
Few updates. Show up or just send me an e-mail.
Distance. I want to see you in what you're writing about. I generally don't care about your cat. Friday cat blogging is a joke, and always was a joke. The joke being I need to get something on the blog but it's Friday and I don't feel like working. (Ha-ha-ha.)
Feeds truncated to the point where I don't know what the item is about. If you're that desperate for revenue, put ads in your RSS. Or make brands your keywords.
Inverse pyramids. If I'd a wanted mucilage, I'd a ordered mucilage.
Predictability. Let me know you're having fun, because otherwise I'm not.
Oh, and in covering blogs? Don't ignore off-topic posts. Sometimes they're the best you're going to see, even from a good writer.
One final thought. I think this is a pretty good blog. We've got comments, we post regularly, we cover a lot of ground, and I don't always quote conventional wisdom as though Moses (or even Moore) brought it down from a mountain on a stone (or silicon) tablet (or wafer).
What I like: Using a post to point out a similarity or trend involving two seemingly separate news items. It's added value, because you might not find that anywhere else. It can be serious -- a noticable short-term uptick in corporate exec movement in a certain industry -- or silly -- a spate of celebutante auto accidents.
What I dislike: Not only few updates, but irregularly-scheduled ones. If you're going to limit posting to three days a week, then stick to that; don't take your usual Wednesday off without warning. Like any media, you show respect for your audience by delivering when you say you will, not just whenever you feel like it.
2. Ben Fulton on November 17, 2005 10:22 AM writes...
The one that most people usually add is, "Make your blog about a specific topic." Is this one really true? I blog about all kinds of stuff, but if I had to keep myself even to a topic as broad as "Politics", I wouldn't update nearly as often.
Single topic blogs are great from an ad relevancy point (after all, the great magazine Byte apparently folded because their excellent articles were too eclectic and thus the magazine was hard to target for the PC/Mac/chooseyourreligion adbuyers of the late 90s.
I'd say, be specific but deviate occasionally. A little diversity is fun, lack of focus is disconcerting. Good quality trumps it all.
4. Brad Hutchings on November 17, 2005 01:39 PM writes...
Likes: things that get me thinking.
Dislikes: meta discussions about blogging. Reminds me of advice most men have heard at some point: have something interesting to talk about, or you're gonna end up talking about "the relationship".
The linked article below provides some opinions from Dana Blankenhorn on what he likes to see in a blog. As business journalist he has the opportunity to read tons of content from the business sense, but can also applies those concepts to blogging in ... [Read More]
1. CT on November 16, 2005 07:45 PM writes...
One of each...
What I like: Using a post to point out a similarity or trend involving two seemingly separate news items. It's added value, because you might not find that anywhere else. It can be serious -- a noticable short-term uptick in corporate exec movement in a certain industry -- or silly -- a spate of celebutante auto accidents.
What I dislike: Not only few updates, but irregularly-scheduled ones. If you're going to limit posting to three days a week, then stick to that; don't take your usual Wednesday off without warning. Like any media, you show respect for your audience by delivering when you say you will, not just whenever you feel like it.
Permalink to Comment2. Ben Fulton on November 17, 2005 10:22 AM writes...
The one that most people usually add is, "Make your blog about a specific topic." Is this one really true? I blog about all kinds of stuff, but if I had to keep myself even to a topic as broad as "Politics", I wouldn't update nearly as often.
Permalink to Comment3. Espen on November 17, 2005 01:03 PM writes...
Single topic blogs are great from an ad relevancy point (after all, the great magazine Byte apparently folded because their excellent articles were too eclectic and thus the magazine was hard to target for the PC/Mac/chooseyourreligion adbuyers of the late 90s.
Permalink to CommentI'd say, be specific but deviate occasionally. A little diversity is fun, lack of focus is disconcerting. Good quality trumps it all.
4. Brad Hutchings on November 17, 2005 01:39 PM writes...
Likes: things that get me thinking.
Dislikes: meta discussions about blogging. Reminds me of advice most men have heard at some point: have something interesting to talk about, or you're gonna end up talking about "the relationship".
Permalink to Comment5. Russ on November 17, 2005 03:42 PM writes...
Not central to the post but kinda spooky:
Superman I- George Reeves
Permalink to CommentSuperman II-Christopher Reeve