Conservatives have long complained the press is biased against them. Lately liberals have taken up the same cry.
Now technologists have the right to call out the media as well. When an organization that claims to be totally dedicated to the search for objective truth, like the Associated Press, starts slipping bias into its tech coverage, watch out.
I first saw the story, and headline, in the Rocky Mountain News. Opera has placed BitTorrent support directly into its browser, hoping that will help it pick up market share against Firefox and Explorer.
But the headline? Piracy tool turns legit. And the text was no better. " The Opera Web browser will soon support a file-transfer tool commonly associated with online movie piracy."
Excuse me, AP, but bull-cookies. BitTorrent is not Kazaa. It's a technology. There's no business there. Blaming BitTorrent for piracy is like blaming FTP or SMTP or even HTTP for piracy, because you can move copyrighted files. You can move copyrighted content across all Internet protocols. They are value-neutral. And the head of Opera even told you why he did this -- because it enabled the rapid distribution of Opera itself and Opera wanted such a capability widely-available.
Techdirt went ape-biscuits over this, as they should have, but never considered why the AP acted as it did.
Here's why.
Journalism is a copyright industry.
Newspapers in particular are upset over others' "stealing" their work, if only through hyperlinks. AP, in fact, is moving toward a model that will charge for online use of its wire.
Note, please, that the link to AP's release on this from Wikipedia has been taken down, and the New York Times story linked from here is now behind a paid firewall.
The news industry as a whole is moving increasingly toward the idea that stories are commodities, like movies or recordings, and that common Internet usage of such material represents piracy. Many AP papers are now behind registration firewalls, and AP's new pricing policy will accelerate the trend.
Thus, the AP has an institutional bias against the Internet, a business bias.
But what I was told in journalism school is that reporters have a duty, not to be unbiased (which is impossible) but to be fair, which is to know their biases and lean against them.
This too the AP is no longer willing to do.
And so we will now learn. Can a co-op continue to hold up the banner of fairness after it tosses away its soul? When we can no longer assume fairness in your writing about yourself, where can we assume fairness?
We have a right, now, not to believe AP. And that's a great loss to us all.
1. Ohadi Langis on July 18, 2005 10:48 PM writes...
You bet your bippy AP is biased against Opera. Just look at the lousy review AP gave to the release of Opera 8.0 and the praises the same AP writer sang for Mozilla's Firefox browser. OPera V.8.0 is the best release of the product and all they got from AP was a sniff and a kick in the pants. Bias? Yes sir!
Permalink to Comment2. J. King on July 19, 2005 09:37 AM writes...
Oh, come on. That's not bias; it's just sensationalism. The only bias is in the headline: the whole text of the article is pretty factual, as far as I can tell. Accusing a news outlet of sensationalism is like accusing wintertime of being cold.
As for the news industry's hostility toward the open-content nature of the Web, I think you're assigning malice where there is none. Newspapers and news services pay writer to write articles, and they then recoup that investment by selling newspapers, or selling articles to newspapers.
Though the availability of AP's content on the Web doesn't directly present a barrier to newspapers buying their articles, it does present a problem to newspapers, who are trying to sell news (and advertising, of course) to the end-user. If newspapers sell less, they'd have less money to expend and may decide to buy less articles from AP.
It's not so much the stories that are the commodities; it's the man-hours invested in producing them that matter.
That said, requiring registration without requiring payment is indeed very user-hostile to no benefit. This may just be a failing on the part of AP's Web site managing staff to understand how the Web is supposed to work, though.
Permalink to Comment3. matt potter on July 19, 2005 05:48 PM writes...
Don't say "journalist industry"; say "publishing industry". Journalists are a lot different than publishers. And I agree with you. For instance, CNN, owned by Time, is constantly running "exposes"
Permalink to Commenton file sharing and piracy. The message is clear. However, the market is speaking, and no amount of propoganda will turn back the tide.
4. Marcin on July 21, 2005 08:21 AM writes...
Tech reporting has always been ill-informed rubbish. Come to think of it, all news from commercial mass media appears to be hugely distorted, it's just not so obvious in non-tech stories from the commercial guys.
Permalink to Comment