« New Left |
Main
| Intel's New Direction »
May 05, 2005
Scaled Credibility
Posted by Dana Blankenhorn
Dmitri Eroshenko is warning the Internet advertising space that the sky is falling due to click fraud. (Illustration from Coolstuff4writers.)
There is click fraud, and the higher the value attached to a click the more likely it is. There are both human and automated click fraud programs out there.
But the sky is not falling. Click fraud is not destroying Internet advertising. In fact, business is booming. CP/M (as in cost-per-thousand) programs are making a comeback. Sponsorships are on the rise.
Besides, Eroshenko's hands aren't clean. He writes as an executive with ClickLab, a company in the business of solutions for click fraud. In other words, he's selling something.
This sort of thing happens all the time. The mobile phone virus scare is driven, in part, by people who want to sell you mobile phone anti-virus software.
What has changed?
What's different now is that the computer press lacks both the will and the resources to properly investigate the charges, find out just how real the problem is, and give those in the market honest, unbiased advice on it.
As the computer press has atomized into the blogosphere we've lost something important, scaled credibility. No one has the budget to put several people onto a story, over several weeks, and let them conduct both real-world tests and interviews which will go out to millions of readers.
Market research firms lack the credibility to do the job, and even if they didn't, their business models would force them to charge so much that most people in the market would never get more than a hint of the answer, let alone a taste of the solution.
I smell an opportunity.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Journalism | e-commerce | ethics | marketing | online advertising
- RELATED ENTRIES
- The Legend of Dennis Hayes
- Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
- Welcome to 1966
- What Must Craigslist Do?
- No Such Thing as Free WiFi
- The Internet As A Political Issue
- Google Images Ruled Illegal
- Fall of Radio Shack
1. Jesse Kopelman on May 5, 2005 04:08 PM writes...
There was a good discussion about this "opportunity" at GigaOm a while back, you might want to drop him a line. ANyway, I don't think there was ever any credibility to loss in technology reporting. Long before blogs, most articles I read in trade publications (especially wireless) were more corporate press announcements than independently researched stories. Talking (or writing) heads took over journalism a long time ago. The problem is especially bad in technical journalism where one needs quite an education just to be able to do competant research. I think blogs are the salvation, as they allow the well informed (and the otherwise opinionated) to chime in and give alternate perspectives. I never trust anything I read that doesn't have feedback. It's like a new more efficient form of peer review.
Permalink to Comment