Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Just Released the 2008 Tribalization of Business study - an in-depth look at how 140+ organizations are managing and measuring online communities

Moore's Lore

« American Diaspora 14 | Main | BBC Brown-out »

April 13, 2005

WiFi Movement in Disarray

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

Lenin named his small movement the Bolsheviks, a word meaning majority. He called his majority opponents Mensheviks, a word meaning minority.

The point is that if one side is large and undisciplined while the other side is smaller but tightly disciplined, the smaller group can win a political struggle.

That seems to be the case with municipal wifi. It's an undeniable good everyone wants. It's relatively cheap to install and maintain. It should be a no-brainer.

But it's losing to telephone monopolies because of lax discipline.

I've gotten a taste of that this week in criticisms of my recent pieces on Philly's WiFi plan.

Glenn Fleishman (his smiling face adorns the top of this item) writes the Philly plan is just what I want, admitting that fact is not being reported. Jesse Kopelman adds that Philly can't put in WiMax because Intel's mobility expectations means gear won't be available for two years.

Both may be right. (I've reported before on Intel's WiMax moves, but didn't think they had delayed production.) I may be wrong. But if Glenn and Jesse are correct then we're all proving this larger point, that advocates of municipal wireless are losing the political struggle to a smaller, more disciplined force. We're all on the same side. We shouldn't be arguing with one another.

So I think it's vital for this movement to get organized, and to seek allies among the corporations that will benefit from its success.

I also think it's vital that advocates of municipal wifi understand they're in a political struggle, and to start acting like it. Unlike every other telecomm issue that has come before, which could be sorted out among elites, municipal WiFi depends upon government action, meaning it is inherently political.

twincities_image1.jpg
I'm certain advocates of these plans, like the one now coming to Minneapolis (left), hoped they could do this in a non-partisan, non-political way. Yet they were going up against the largest, savviest corporate manipulators of government in the country -- the nation's phone companies. This hope was terribly naive.

The only way to success now is through online political organizing. There's a huge cohort of people out there who were politically activated through the Internet in the last two years. Here is an issue for them.

And the full range of tools need to be employed. We need to activate people locally, get out honest information from a central store, educate the media, make this a political issue against legislators who defy us and, as noted, seek allies.

It's a political struggle, a bare-knuckled one at that. And unless the advocates of municipal WiFi start treating it in that way, Americans are going to suffer many more years of high prices for slow broadband, without the competition needed to push things forward.

Comments (2) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: 802.11 | Always On | Consulting | Digital Divide | Internet | Journalism | Politics | Telecommunications


COMMENTS

1. Harold Feld on April 13, 2005 04:56 PM writes...

I see pieces like this routinely from the folks on the sidelines. A few thoughts:

1) Just about everybody in municipal wi-fi land understands this is a political struggle pure and simple. There may be some simple souls out there who think the incumbents can see reason, but everyone else understands this is about incumbents regulating away a potential competitor.

2) Democracy is messy. It is "disorganized" in the sense that opposition comes from many directions and many interest groups. That's a feature, btw, not a bug. But collaboration among groups on this issue is strong.
It is also "disorganized" in that there is no cabal sharing an agenda and apportioning resources in the way that the incumbents, who are few in number, can do. But again, this is a strength, not a weakness. It enables interests and citizens from all walks of life and political parties to comfortably come together and say "legislation blocking munis is a _bad_ idea." That so many, from so many different walks of life say it, makes it more persuasive than the lock-step marching of the incumbents and their flacks.

3) We are not losing. Prior to 2004, this stuff sailed through the legislatures of 13 states. As of today, despite pending bills in more than 10 states, NOT A SINGLE ANTI-MUNI BILL HAS PASSED SINCE PENNSYLVANIA. In Indiana, the Bill failed to get out of Committee. In TX, the home of SBC, the anti-muni provision remains deadlocked in the Senate. In Florida, stronghold of Bell South, compromise legislation to permit muni systems was approved by the Senate instead of the industry bill. In Iowa and Nebraska, the legislation is up for grabs.

Pennsylvania represented the last time the incumbents got a free ride for this stuff. In the short time since then, a national movement of citizens has risen up to tell its state legislators that the people want broadband and will not be denied. It's a fight. It's messy. It's a disorganized multi-headed mob. But it is carrying the day against forces that by conventional wisdom are supposed to be unstoppable. Only the amature pundits would think otherwise.

Harold Feld
Media Access Project

Permalink to Comment

2. Malcolm Matson on April 14, 2005 03:36 AM writes...

"...so I think it's time this movement got organised" writes Dana Blankenhorn.
You are so right Dana but let's see your action as well as your wise words: .... contribute to this INTERNATIONAL movement (no good taking a parochial US stance on this one!)before it goes public!

www.oplan.org
Username: oplan
Password: patron

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7225


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack