Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Don't Miss The AppGap, a blog on the future of the office and small business. Sponsored by QuickBase.

Moore's Lore

« The Issue of Our Time | Main | Finding the Good Stuff »

April 02, 2005

Which Medium Shares Grief Best?

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

john paul II on time.jpgWhen CNN was new they decided to cover a Midnight Mass at St. Patrick's Cathedral. What I remember was how the anchors chose to talk over everything, so you felt their ego trips rather than the ceremony.

I got the same feeling, in triplicate, watching coverage of Pope John Paul II's death today. Grief is shared through human interaction, but all we got on TV today was a simulation.

Catholicism is the most ritualistic of America's major religions, but viewers saw little of the power in this ritual. Instead we listened to talking heads on all channels, complete with anchors' ego trips, experts speculating, and cameras thrust in peoples' faces when they had nothing to say.

If you looked at major media Web sites you got more of the same. It was about them, not about him, and certainly not about us.

What about the blogosphere?

Well, it started with a lot of glop about Fox (and others) exaggerating his death before it happened. (Ha, ha.)

But then it got much better.

Nick Queen found the actual process the Church goes through when a Pope dies, not the speculation offered by American networks.

Richard Lorenc offered a kind and heartfelt obituary. Okie on the Lam offered both grief and appropriate exhaustion. And Temple Stark offered a defense of the man while disagreeing with his politics, noting how he died with dignity.

These are just the first few hours after this news event, but I am convinced that as time passes the distance between the Internet and broadcast coverage will become ever clearer.

The Internet is personal, it is heartfelt, it is sometimes profane, it is diverse and (most important) it is interactive. What you have to say is as important as what anyone else has to say.

Broadcasters claim to be sharing an experience, but what they should do instead is show it. Their role in leading the congregation has been replaced, and the sooner someone in that business realizes it the faster the lot of them will shut up, so we can get on with the serious business of grieving for the most important Pope of our lifetime.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Internet | Journalism | blogging | personal


TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7200


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack