Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Check out the The AppGap - a group blog on the tools and trends that are changing the way we work.

Moore's Lore

« The Real Stasi | Main | Sunrise, Sunset for Poor Man's Cellular »

March 21, 2005

Et Tu, Barry Diller?

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

barry diller.jpgThroughout the dot-boom Barry Diller stood aloof. He promised he would never overpay for "Internet real estate," that he would grow his business by finding bargains. (The picture is from this Wired article where he displays far more wisdom about Internet valuations than displayed today.)

For several years he stayed true to that. You can justify the prices paid for Home Shopping Network, Expedia.Com, Hotels.Com, and Ticketmaster based on revenues and earnings. They sold stuff -- toasters, travel packages, concert tickets -- and earned real money.

But $1.85 billion for an outfit with trailing year sales of $261 million? That's over 7 times sales, about 40 times earnings.

Sorry, Barry, you finally drank the Kool-Aid.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I've read all Diller's excuses. Synergy. Scarce real estate. Finishes the platform. Yadda-yadda-yadda.

But you don't have to own a search engine in order to be an Internet winner. There's no scarcity of search engines, either. Google came from nothing, and if someone else has a better algorithm, or a better way of doing things, they can still come from nowhere. They can do it a lot faster than AskJeeves can come from fifth with aging, gimmickry technology.

After buying CitySearch, which had nothing going for it, I thought Diller had leraned his lesson. After that he bought companies that sold stuff -- real stuff -- and derived income from it -- real income. No more "Internet advertising" and "page view" crap.

Until now.

Barry, Barry, Barry....

To those of us who still believe in value-based Internet investing, this is the unkindest cut of all.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business Strategy | Economics | Internet | Investment | e-commerce | online advertising


COMMENTS

1. Lyle Clarke on March 22, 2005 07:01 AM writes...

Well I for one thing it is a great thing. Perhaps there is real hope for Bloglines now.

Ask bought Bloglines a couple of weeks ago. A huge chunk of my online experience, both on a mobile phone and my desktop, has revolved around Bloglines for 6 months or so. Bloglines is my start page and for me, has become the centre of the Internet more than Netscape, Yahoo, Hotmail, Slashdot or Google (oh how time flies) ever were.

Something similar was true when Ask Jeeves bought Teoma. Teoma was hugely promising back when Google was suffering under the combined weight of blogs and SEO tricks in the index. At that stage Teoma was delivering better results than Google, and the clusters idea was working great. I was using it all the time and loving it. Then Ask Jeeves then buys it, peels off the decent interface, plonks the database behind Ask, and then stops going after Google, which Teoma clearly was pre-purchase. Wouldn't it be a real shame if Bloglines suffered the same fade away fate? Yes. Is it likely? Both Ask and Bloglines say No, but look at the Ask stable, count the faded lights, and apply salt.

So Diller buying Ask is great thing. He doesn't want to let his money go to waste, even if it is sharemarket funny money, so hopefully he will make sure good innovative things happen that I'm absolutely sure the big Ask dinosaur simply isn't capable of, even if the small guys in the respective units are champing at the bit.

Lyle

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7168


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack