Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Don't Miss The AppGap, a blog on the future of the office and small business. Sponsored by QuickBase.

Moore's Lore

« T-Mobile Drops Sidekick Service | Main | Dean Kamen Gets It »

March 11, 2005

Doerr Doesn't Get It

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

A delegation from the TechNet lobby, including John Doerr (Rice '73) and Cisco chief John Chambers, were on Capitol Hill today warning legislators that the U.S. is in danger of losing its technology lead.

By some measures, it has already happened.

TechNet wants more spending on math and science education, especially in middle schools, and more tech-oriented retraining for displaced workers.

Amen to that. Both my kids felt math was fun in 4th grade, but neither is pursuing it anymore. My son's school refused to challenge him in 7th grade, resorting to a curriculum he'd already learned, and he lost interest. My daughter was bedeviled by reading difficulties and her strength in math was ignored.

Then Doerr went off and spoiled it all by saying something stupid.

"When it comes to the future of innovation, the most important thing we can get right is to protect broad-based employee ownership in the form of stock options," Doerr said, demanding that stock options not be expensed.

Please. The idea that innovation depends on accounting games, and in hosing public stockholders in favor of insiders (at any level) is simply ludicrous.

Here Doerr has a chance to be a statesman, and he goes off on a greedhead trip. Sorry, I'm Rice '77 so I take it personally.

Doerr's special pleading on behalf of hosing investors destroyed the impact of what should have been powerful testimony. Maybe it's because both Doerr and Chambers were big investors in the present Administration, at both its elections.

But if these two men are looking for who to blame for America's tech troubles, I have some simple advice.

Look in the mirror, gentlemen.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Futurism | Politics | Science | fun stuff | personal


COMMENTS

1. Alice Marshall on March 11, 2005 12:45 PM writes...

Someone needs to tell Chambers that he can't say one thing on Capitol Hill and another to IT World Magazine.

"What we're trying to do is outline an entire strategy of becoming a Chinese company," Chambers said.
http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2418/040927techchina/pfindex.html

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7131


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack