Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Don't Miss The AppGap, a blog on the future of the office and small business. Sponsored by QuickBase.

Moore's Lore

« Pull My Finger (Or Pull My Leg) | Main | Palm Responds »

February 08, 2005

Sprint's Clue

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

Some big news went unnoticed last week .

Sprint's earnings nearly quadrupled.

This is fascinating because Sprint, alone among U.S. telcos, has a unique business model, at least in cellular.

It wholesales.

Lots of companies, from Virgin to Earthlink to Disney, have gotten into the cellular game by re-selling Sprint's capacity. They all have their reasons. They all have their own branding, their own marketing, and their own niches.

The point is Sprint is profiting from wholesaling capacity to these companies. Profiting big time.

Why hasn't this been pointed out?

The major U.S. wireline telcos -- Qwest, SBC, Verizon and BellSouth -- fight like tigers against the idea of wholesaling their capacity.

They have spent literally tens of millions (maybe hundreds) over the last few years winning the "right" not to wholesale their broadband to what were thousands of ISPs (and are now 10s of ISPs) anxious to help them make money on it.

How's that going for them? Not well. None of the major wireline companies has reported so much as a great quarter this century. All of them see earnings growth in terms of lay-offs. That's what the proposed SBC-AT&T deal is about -- lay-offs.

They have lots of excuses. Wireless competition is one. Cable is one.

Yet they refuse to try something that Sprint has proved works -- wholesaling capacity to other companies.

When companies refuse to do things that can lead to profit -- when they go to government and make it their ally in this refusal -- what are customers (or voters) to say?

You know what I say, and I'll say it again.

The Bells must die.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business Models | Business Strategy | Economics | Investment | Telecommunications


COMMENTS

1. Jesse Kopelman on February 8, 2005 07:32 PM writes...

I wish this problem were confined to the Bells. For some reason, the idea of not growing into a monopoly has somehow become unAmerican. To admit that your company cannot master all potential markets is anathama. To actually cooperate with another company instead of freezing or buying them out is a sign of weakness.

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7025


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack