\n"; echo $styleSheet; ?>
include("http://www.corante.com/admin/header.html"); ?>
Many people reading my stuff think I'm some wild-eyed anti-intellectual property radical.
Labels used for dismissal are as old as labels themselves. But I'm a writer. I make my living from copyright. I'm not trying to tear down the copyright system. I am, in fact, trying to protect it.
I believe firmly that laws which go too far are routinely ignored, while those that are reasonable are routinely followed. Today's laws go too far the way a 21-year old drinking age, aimed mainly at keeping 15 year olds from becoming drunks, turns Yale mixers into criminal conspiracy. (Old enough to fight and die in Iraq, old enough to vote, I say. But that's another column.)
It's time for some reason, for compromise, on copyright. Here it is:

The picture is of Charles Wilson Peale's 1791 Thomas Jefferson, who originally opposed any mention of copyright or "monopolies" in the Constitution, but finally supported the document's compromise language.
And in return for all this? In return for this you'll get universal support for cracking down on pirates, thieves, and everyone else bothering the copyright industries. With the people on your side you'll win. Without us you'll lose.
I think this compromise will win us.
I think merely preventing corporations from owning IP is the pancea. When the rights belong to the people who actually did the work, a higher degree of propriety is achieved. Would this cause corporations to stop funding research? I don't think so. They could still contract for first right of refusal for any IP developed on company money. Anyway, their researchers would be all the more motivated.
Permalink to Comment