\n"; echo $styleSheet; ?>
include("http://www.corante.com/admin/header.html"); ?>We're in the midst of a transition. Mobile phones are becoming integrated with the rest of the computing world. (Crystal ball courtesy this great site on psychic phenomena, reminding all of the need for skepticism.)
It's the best of times. It's the worst of times.
It's a time of exciting new products. It's also a time of wholesale confusion.
Mainly it's a time when network owners are trying to re-do history, to "get the Internet right," in a way that benefits them, to give vendors control over what people do with their technology.
That effort is doomed. We care no more for Little Brother, in the end, than Big Brother. The Internet didn't win-out over proprietary networks by chance. It was by design. Pass the bits and worry about the money later. Keep the inside as dumb as possible. Let the market sort it all out.
That was then. This is now. So what happens next?
I don't think "pass the bits and take the money later" is a sustainable business model now. At the high end, yes. We are seeing services like wireless broadband, and the trend is definitely to get higher speeds and more people. Verizon's plan is $80/month, works on one computer (which you could easily configure as a gateway and share via 802.11x if it's a Mac), and is limited to the major metro areas. $150 for the PC card. This is very niche -- I don't even know anyone who has this.
At the low end, there is too much squeezing going on to keep the wireless business sustainable AND accessible to the mainstream. Whether it be add-on services and features to the basic plan, overages, contracts -- they are designed to twist revenue out of everything. Most people aren't going to spend more than $40/month on their wireless phone.
As wireless broadband adoption increases, costs of delivery come down, more competition ensues, sure... it will come to dominate. But it's at the very start of the curve now and will take a good couple of years to take off.
Permalink to Comment"Most people aren't going to spend more than $40/month on their wireless phone."
I don't buy that. First off, I think the average monthly bill is > $50 right now. Second, it is all about whether the service is worthwhile. How many people, like me are paying > $100 for cable + premium channels + internet to Comcast and their ilk -- quite a few I think. Third, as networks continue to get built out, the idea of going with only a mobile phone becomes more and more practical. What's a typical landline + LD bill look like these days, $60? Sure prices for specific services will keep coming down, but I really don't think $100 mobile bills will be hard for people to swallow if they are getting the services they want.
Permalink to CommentForest through the trees Jesse. Your quibble only adds more support to my point that "make it free and open and collect money later" won't work now. As to the quibble... The demo with the most ubiquitous use of mobile phones and features (text messaging, etc.) is the very young -- teenagers to early twenty-somethings. They top out at $40/month a person and are usually part of a family plan. When I was a teenager, the arguments with my parents were about 1 am curfews. Now, it's about IM overages.
Permalink to Comment