Home > The Loom
A Blog About Life, Past and Future

Winner of the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s 2004 Science Journalism Award

Scientific American Science and Technology Awards 2005

About this Author
Carl Zimmer Carl Zimmer is the author of several popular science books and writes frequently for the New York Times, as well as for magazines including The New York Times Magazine, National Geographic, Science, Newsweek, Popular Science, and Discover, where he is a contributing editor. Carl's books include Soul Made Flesh,, Parasite Rex and Evolution: The Triumph of An Idea. His latest book is Smithsonian Intimate Guide to Human Origins. Please send newsworthy items or feedback to blog-at-carlzimmer.com.
The Latest on Human Evolution!
Smithsonian%20small.jpg Smithsonian Intimate Guide to Human Origins
More on the book...
UPCOMING TALKS

Test calendar
Recent Newspaper & Magazine Articles
."Children Learn by Monkey See, Monkey Do. Chimps Don' t "
The New York Times, December 13, 2005


."A Pair of Wings Took Evolving Insects on a Nonstop Flight to Domination "

The New York Times, November 29, 2005


."From the Mouths of Lizards Spew Clues to the Origin of Snake Venom "
The New York Times, November 22, 2005


."In Give and Take of Evolution, a Surprising Contribution From Islands"
The New York Times, November 22, 2005


."Down For the Count "
The New York Times, November 8, 2005


."The Neurobiology of the Self "
Scientific American, November 2005


."Can Chimps Talk? "
Forbes.com, October 24, 2005


."DNA Studies Suggest Emperor Is Most Ancient of Penguins "
The New York Times, October 11, 2005


."The History of Chromosomes May Shape the Future of Diseases "
The New York Times, August 30, 2005


."Building a Virtual Microbe, Gene by Gene by Gene "
The New York Times, August 16, 2005




FULL-TEXT ARTICLE ARCHIVE

MORE BOOKS
Soul Made Flesh
A 2004 New York Times Notable Book of the Year


evocover.jpg Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea (2001)

prexcover.jpg Parasite Rex (2000)

watercover.jpg At the Water's Edge (1998)
WHY "THE LOOM"?

"...among the joyous, heartless, ever-juvenile eternities, Pip saw the multitudinous, God-omnipresent, coral insects, that out of the firmament of waters, heaved the colossal orbs. He saw God's foot upon the treadle of the loom, and spoke it; and therefore his shipmates called him mad."
--Moby Dick

COMMENT POLICY

By submitting a comment, you grant Carl Zimmer permission to quote or republish this comment without restriction, notification, or compensation. Also, you acknowledge that you alone are fully responsible for (and bear full legal liability for) the content of this comment – including inaccuracies or potentially libelous statements. You certify that in this comment you have disclosed no proprietary or confidential information. This agreement applies even if you choose to post anonymously or supply false or incomplete identification.

Spirited debate is welcome, but comments that are spam, off-topic, seriously offensive, or otherwise inappropriate will be removed at my discretion. Comments may take up to a day to be posted, due to filtering, although usually they will be posted immediately. I do not fact-check, spell-check, or otherwise verify or correct comments.



RECENT ENTRIES
RECENT COMMENTS [xml]
Starting Points and Old Favorites
Eyes, Part One: Opening Up the Russian Doll

Eyes, Part Two: Fleas, Fish, and the Careful Art of Deconstruction

Florida, Where The Living Is Contradictory

The Chromosome Shuffle

Of Stem Cells and Neanderthals

Taking the Plunge

Your Loss is Your Gain

Divine Worms


Recent Trackbacks
› Chaotic Utopia:
Weird weather and bifurcations

› Watermark:
CUTE! Cats

› Critical Biomass:
Macskk

› MonkeyFilter:
Cat Family Tree

› Pharyngula:
It's good to know…

› 無修正動画の楽しみ方:
無修正 画像の楽しみ方





Subscribe with Bloglines

Creative Commons License
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline


The Loom

February 04, 2005
Farewell, ErnstEmail This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Carl Zimmer
Category: Evolution


COMMENTS
the bunyip on February 5, 2005 04:10 PM writes...

It is difficult to offer appropriate comment on the loss of such a giant in our field. Mayr's books have been an inspiration to me for many years. We need more such minds - with his ability to express what's in them.

He'll be missed sorely.

Permalink to Comment
charlie wagner on February 6, 2005 09:16 AM writes...

Carl Zimmer in Discover Magazine wrote:
"The Avida team makes their software freely available on the Internet, and creationists have downloaded it over and over again in hopes of finding a fatal flaw. While theyve uncovered a few minor glitches, Ofria says they have yet to find anything serious. We literally have an army of thousands of unpaid bug testers, he says. What more could you want?"


The fatal flaw is that this simulation bears absolutely no resemblance to what actually goes on in nature. Its an exercise in nothing. Its no different than when Ptolemy proposed a theory for the motions of the bodies in the universe that placed the earth at the center and then derived a complex system of epicycles and built mechanical orreries to simulate these proposed motions and to *prove* that this is what was really happening.
It seems self-evident to me, and it should to all other observers that living organisms are far more technologically advanced and organized than any machine that humans can build. It stands to reason that an intelligence greater than human intelligence was required to construct them. In what dimension can random chance and accidental occurrences produce what the human mind is incapable of producing?
It just seems so incredibly simple to me.

Christopher Zeeman. quoted by Ian Stewart in "Does God Play Dice?" wrote:
"First came the astronomers observing the motions of the heavenly bodies and collecting data. Secondly came the mathematicians inventing mathematical notation to describe the motions and fit the data. Thirdly came the technicians making mechanical models to simulate those mathematical constructions. Fourthly came generations of students who learned their astronomy from these machines. Fifthly came scientists whose imagination had been so blinkered by generations of such learning that they actually believed that this was how the heavens worked. Sixthly came the authorities who insisted upon the received dogma. And so the human race was fooled into accepting the Ptolemaic System for a thousand years."

Permalink to Comment
charlie wagner on February 6, 2005 09:30 AM writes...

On the death of Ernst Mayr:

As John Donne wrote, "every man's death diminishes me, because I am involved with mankind". Mayr lived a long and full life and should be applauded for his accomplishments.
This does not diminish the fact that he was an intellectual tyrant who was wrong in just about everything he said.
I was so glad that Barbara McClintock lived to see her views vindicated and her colleagues to admit they were wrong. Likewise, I'm glad for Mayr that he didn't live long enough to see the day that his theories would be shown to be incorrect.
While I mourn the passing of any man, I also hope that his views on evolution die with him.

Charlie Wagner
http://enigma.charliewagner.com

Permalink to Comment
PvM on February 6, 2005 07:29 PM writes...

I am saddened to see how Charlie is not only using Mayr's thread to present his ignorant comments on Avida but also his viewpoints of Mayr. There are times Charlie where it is wisest to just keep your mouth shut lest you like to portray yourself in a very negative light here.

Sad but elucidating nevertheless... It shows us what kind of 'man' Charlie is.

Permalink to Comment
ceibatree on February 7, 2005 08:41 AM writes...

Booo to you charlie, you ignorant pile of feces! I hope your jebus infests your bowels with a million hungry varmints. Seriously, if you want to put forth your' never-ending nonsensical arguments, there are better ways.

Permalink to Comment


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL: http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8766
More on Mayr from Pharyngula I didn't say anything in my prior article on Mayr, so I thought I'd at least mention what I personally thought of him. I disagreed strongly with some of his ideas on evolution—I think his version of evolutionary biology was far too narr... [Read More]

Tracked on February 4, 2005 09:37 PM




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES