Corante

Corante: technology, business, media, law, and culture news from the blogosphere
<$MTBlogName$> OUR PUBLICATIONS:
Corante Blogs

Corante Blogs examine, through the eyes of leading observers, analysts, thinkers, and doers, critical themes and memes in technology, business, law, science, and culture.

The Press Will Be Outsourced Before Stopped

Vin Crosbie, on the challenges, financial and otherwise, that newspaper publishers are facing: "The real problem, Mr. Newspaperman, isn't that your content isn't online or isn't online with multimedia. It's your content. Specifically, it's what you report, which stories you publish, and how you publish them to people, who, by the way, have very different individual interests. The problem is the content you're giving them, stupid; not the platform its on."
by Vin Crosbie in Rebuilding Media

Travels In Numerica Deserta

There's a problem in the drug industry that people have recognized for some years, but we're not that much closer to dealing with it than we were then. We keep coming up with these technologies and techniques which seem as if they might be able to help us with some of our nastiest problems - I'm talking about genomics in all its guises, and metabolic profiling, and naturally the various high-throughput screening platforms, and others. But whether these are helping or not (and opinions sure do vary), one thing that they all have in common is that they generate enormous heaps of data.
by Derek Lowe in In the Pipeline

Disrobing the Emperor: The online “user experience” isn't much of one

Now that the Web labor market is saturated and Web design a static profession, it's not surprising that 'user experience' designers and researchers who've spent their careers online are looking for new worlds to conquer. Some are returning to the “old media” as directors and producers. More are now doing offline consulting (service experience design, social policy design, exhibition design, and so on) under the 'user experience' aegis. They argue that the lessons they've learned on the Web can be applied to phenomena in the physical and social worlds. But there are enormous differences...
by Bob Jacobson in Total Experience

Second Life: What are the real numbers?

Clay Shirky, in deconstructing Second Life hype: "Second Life is heading towards two million users. Except it isn’t, really... I suspect Second Life is largely a 'Try Me' virus, where reports of a strange and wonderful new thing draw the masses to log in and try it, but whose ability to retain anything but a fraction of those users is limited. The pattern of a Try Me virus is a rapid spread of first time users, most of whom drop out quickly, with most of the dropouts becoming immune to later use."
by Clay Shirky in Many-to-Many

The democratisation of everything

Over the last few years we've seen old barriers to creativity coming down, one after the other. New technologies and services makes it trivial to publish text, whether by blog or by print-on-demand. Digital photography has democratised a previously expensive hobby. And we're seeing the barriers to movie-making crumble, with affordable high-quality cameras and video hosting provided by YouTube or Google Video and their ilk... Music making has long been easy for anyone to engage in, but technology has made high-quality recording possible without specialised equipment, and the internet has revolutionised distribution, drastically disintermediating the music industry... What's left? Software maybe? Or maybe not."
by Suw Charman in Strange Attractor

RNA Interference: Film at Eleven

Derek Lowe on the news that the Nobel Prize for medicine has gone to Craig Mello and Andrew Fire for their breakthrough work: "RNA interference is probably going to have a long climb before it starts curing many diseases, because many of those problems are even tougher than usual in its case. That doesn't take away from the discovery, though, any more than the complications of off-target effects take away from it when you talk about RNAi's research uses in cell culture. The fact that RNA interference is trickier than it first looked, in vivo or in vitro, is only to be expected. What breakthrough isn't?"
by Derek Lowe in In the Pipeline

PVP and the Honorable Enemy

Andrew Phelps: "Recently my WoW guild has been having a bit of a debate on the merits of Player-vs.-Player (PvP) within Azeroth. My personal opinion on this is that PvP has its merits, and can be incredible fun, but the system within WoW is horridly, horribly broken. It takes into account the concept of the battle, but battle without consequence, without emotive context, and most importantly, without honor..."

From later in the piece: "When I talk about this with people (thus far anyway) I typically get one of two responses, either 'yeah, right on!' or 'hey, it’s war, and war isn’t honorable – grow the hell up'. There is a lot to be said for that argument – but the problem is that war in the real historical world has very different constraints that are utterly absent from fantasized worlds..."
by Andrew Phelps in Got Game

Rats Rule, Right?

Derek Lowe: "So, you're developing a drug candidate. You've settled on what looks like a good compound - it has the activity you want in your mouse model of the disease, it's not too hard to make, and it's not toxic. Everything looks fine. Except. . .one slight problem. Although the compound has good blood levels in the mouse and in the dog, in rats it's terrible. For some reason, it just doesn't get up there. Probably some foul metabolic pathway peculiar to rats (whose innards are adapted, after all, for dealing with every kind of garbage that comes along). So, is this a problem?.."
by Derek Lowe in In the Pipeline

Really BAD customer experience at Albertsons Market

Bob Jacobson, on shopping at his local Albertsons supermarket where he had "one of the worst customer experiences" of his life: "Say what you will about the Safeway chain or the Birkenstock billionaires who charge through the roof for Whole Foods' organic fare, they know how to create shopping environments that create a more pleasurable experience, at its best (as at Whole Foods) quite enjoyable. Even the warehouses like Costco and its smaller counterpart, Smart & Final, do just fine: they have no pretentions, but neither do they dump virtual garbage on the consumer merely to create another trivial revenue stream, all for the sake of promotions in the marketing department..."
by Strange Attractor in Total Experience

The Guardian's "Comment is Free"

Kevin Anderson: "First off, I want to say that I really admire the ambition of the Guardian Unlimited’s Comment is Free. It is one of the boldest statements made by any media company that participation needs to be central to a radical revamp of traditional content strategies... It is, therfore, not hugely surprising to find that Comment is Free is having a few teething troubles..."
by Kevin Anderson in strange
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

The Loom

« A Notice to Subscribers | Main | The Howler Test »

January 14, 2004

Orchid Hacks

Email This Entry

Posted by Carl Zimmer

wasporchid.jpgThe emotions that other species summon up in the human brain are perplexing. A lion inspires awe and respect. It is the king of the jungle, a great name for a football team, a noble guardian of the entrance to the New York Public Library. A tapeworm, on the other hand, summons disgust mixed with a little contempt. You will never find yourself cheering for the Kansas City Tapeworms. But are these species really so different? Both animals get their nutrition from the bodies of other animals, and tapeworms are arguably more sophisticated in the way they get their food than a lion. Tapeworms escape our immune systems with ingenious biochemistry, and may even be able to eat our antibodies as food. Some species that live in fish make the fish leap around at the surface of the water so they are easier prey for birds, the final hosts of the tapeworm. And is it any less gruesome to be torn apart by a lion than to be host to a tapeworm? The best that a parasite can hope for, if a parasite could ever hope, would be to inspire fear. That's the fate of parasitoid wasps, which, as I mentioned in a previous post, are the inspiration for the monsters of the Alien series. The precision of their cruelty, the intimate ways in which they can use up their hosts, give us chills. Yet they remain truly alien--a malevolence that is separate from the rest of the natural world.

But parasitoids are very much a part of nature, and what they do is really one a variation on what many other organisms do. It helps, I'd argue, to think of parasitoids as hackers. They have hacked the living code of their hosts--the combination-locks of cell receptors, the wiring of metabolic circuits, the calendars of life history. But parasitoids, as living things, can be hacked as well. And among their hackers are organisms that few would consider malevolent or cunning: orchids.

Flowers and insects have had intimate relationships for tens of millions of years. Honeybees, for example, will travel from flower to flower to gather nectar for food, and accidentally pick up pollen grains along the way. Some of those pollen grains will wind up on another flower of the same species, and will fertilize its seeds. Flowers have adapted to take advantage of these insect couriers with bright petals and convenient landing strips. The easier they can make it for insects to carry their pollen, the more successful they'll be in the evolutionary sweepstakes.

Many orchids have evolved particularly elaborate contraptions for insect pollination. One species keeps its nectar at the bottom of a foot-deep tube, so that only a moth with a foot-long tongue can reach it (and press its face into the orchid's pollen). Another orchid has a spring-loaded catapult that slaps pollen onto the back of bees as they walk toward the flower's nectar. But most elaborate of all are the adaptations of certain orchids in Australia and Europe that offer the insects nothing at all.

Take the parasitoid wasp Neozeleboria cryptoides. The females lay their eggs in insects; the males that emerge from the host grow wings, while the wingless females crawl around on the ground and up various plant stems. The females produce a pheromone in order to attract males. It takes less than a billionth of a gram of the stuff to let a male N. cryptoides pick her out from wasps of other species. It's also enough to let him distinguish between virgin females and ones that have already known the pleasure of another male's company. The male homes in on a suitable female and they mate, whereupon he lifts her up and carries her from eucalyptus tree to eucalyptus tree so that she can drink the juices secreted by aphids. He finally leaves her near an inviting host, where she can lay her eggs.

Most of the time this arrangement works pretty well for the wasps, but every now and then a male will get a shock. He is flying along when he gets the unique whiff of a female seeking a mate. He cruises low to the ground, where the female should be waiting on a plant stem. As the smell of pheromones gets more intense, he see her long slender body hove into view. He lands on her and takes hold, only to find that he has not actually found a female wasp. Instead, he's fumbling around on the end of an orchid flower.

In Australia and Europe, some orchids use love-starved males to spread their pollen. They produce exquisite replicas of the pheromones made by a species of wasp, and they grow lobe-shaped wasp decoys. When a male wasp crashes into the orchid, it gets covered with orchid pollen. If it gets fooled again, it allows the pollen to fertilize another orchid.

The closest relatives of many of these sexual deceivers are deceivers of another sort--orchids that produce the aroma of nectar without the nectar. This kinship hints that some ancestral food deceiver underwent a mutation that made it produce an aroma that was vaguely sexy to some insects. Over time, more mutations helped them create the aroma of attraction instead of food. Some of the structures in the orchid flower began to swell, offering another illusion to the male wasps. The wasps themselves may well have driven the orchid's evolution as well. N. cryptoides. The orchid, like the wasp itself, is a parasite, demanding a toll from the wasps but offering nothing in exchange. Males learn to avoid orchid patches after getting tricked a few times, and any mutation that helps them to a better job of distinguishing between orchids and female wasps will give them an advantage over less discriminating suitors. In order to benefit from sexual deception, the orchids need to continually reinvent their perfumes, so that they are harder to tell apart from wasp pheromones. In the process, they lost the flowery aromas left over from their ancestors, until their odor was pure mimic.

These orchids have not become a faithful replica of a female wasp, however. They offer an exaggerate set of the cues a male wasp relies on to recognize a female was. (It's a bit like the grotesque bust and rear of a woman in a soft-porn cartoon.) In this month's issue of the Journal of Evolutionary Biology, the Swiss biologist Florian Schiestl reports on what male wasps find sexy in an orchid. He was able to do this because earlier this year he isolated the orchid mimic of the N. cryptoides pheromone. Schiestl coated dummy wasps of different sizes with different amounts of synthetic pheromone. He then presented male wasps with pairs of the dummies and recorded which ones they chose.

He found that males prefer bigger females to smaller ones. Size is probably a good clue to the health of a female. The wasp-mimicking structures on the orchids are a third longer than the actual wasps and over five times wider, which just so happens to be the strongest preference of the male wasps. Anything larger was no more attractive than small sizes. In other words, the orchid is perfectly exaggerated. The fake wasp body is as big as it needs to be, without being bigger.

Meanwhile, the male wasps are attracted to stronger pheromone scents over weak ones. Schiestl found that orchids on average produce 10 times more pheromone than female wasps. The flower can pump out vast amounts of pheromones compared to the females, most likely because the females are working under some special constraints. Many predators and parasites use pheromones as signals of potential prey, and so the wasps could risk death if they were too loud in their calls. But these wasp enemies pose no threat to the plants, and so they can shout as loud as they want. And since wasps don't bump into orchids all that often, the louder the better. As a result, an orchid is actually more attractive to a male wasp than a female of his own species.

But even now, the orchids haven't finished hacking into the wasp life cycle. After female wasps mate and their eggs begin to develop, they stop producing pheromones. The developing eggs give off another chemical that male wasps can recognize and which tells them that this female is no longer a virgin. Schiestl has also found that after some sexually deceptive orchid flowers have been pollinated, they release the same postprandial chemicals. The male wasps are repelled--perhaps towards one of the other flowers on the same plant that are still releasing come-hither signals.

In the comments to my previous blog about parasitoids, Walt pointed out that the next move in the Alien series actually going to be a battle between the alien parasitoid and the dreadlocked beast from the Predator series. (Here's the preview.) Now, one of my fondest memories in childhood was watching the various face-offs between Godzilla, Mothra, and the rest. But if nature is our guide, the alien should really meet its match in the luxurious, baffling embrace of a flower.

Comments (5) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Evolution


COMMENTS

1. bigtroutz on January 15, 2004 02:31 AM writes...

Another nit-pick for you. Bees collect flower pollen as food, as well as nectar.

Permalink to Comment

2. Jason Malloy on January 15, 2004 02:39 PM writes...

For people that are curious, here's some pictures of bee orchids (Ophrys apifera). I love mimics. Some recent cool ones that I've come across are the moth that looks like a hummingbird and the black-and-white catterpillar that looks like bird poop.
Did anyone else appreciate the tribute to nature's little tricksters in Master and Commander?

Permalink to Comment

3. Jay Manifold on January 15, 2004 08:45 PM writes...

I suppose my "favorite" parasitoid is Toxoplasma gondii, which causes rats to lose their fear of cats and thereby be eaten, transporting T. gondii into the cat's gut, where it reproduces (without harming the cat); see http://www.microbe.org/news/Tgondii.asp. I think that the best a parasite can hope for is to inspire complacency ... and I might as well have been cheering for the Kansas City Tapeworms last Sunday, but that's another story entirely. ;)

Permalink to Comment

4. anon on January 20, 2004 10:58 AM writes...

Fascinating. I have been intensely interested in these behaviors and what analogies one can draw from them for other areas, particularly human and machine systems. For further reading, I would recommend the RAND study entitled “Unweaving the Web: Deception and Adaptation in Future Urban Operations” found at http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1495/

Keep up the good work.

Permalink to Comment

5. Diane on March 17, 2004 04:32 PM writes...

re: Toxoplasma gondii and cats.

Jay Manifold comments [Jan 15 2004] that T gondii reproduces without harming the cat. I am certain that is true in the majority of cases, but anyone who has been unfortunate to have a cat actually contract Toxoplasmosis could not agree. I had a cat develop Toxoplasmosis in 1993, [probably from a mouse or bird eaten outside] and, despite heroics in treatment, he died. The progression of symptoms was extremely distressing. Those of us who get pregnant ;) are a bit less fond of T. gondii, I suspect.

Please see Cornell University's info at

http://web.vet.cornell.edu/Public/FHC/toxo.html for the science.

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Talking at Woods Hole
Invisible Gladiators in the Petri Dish Coliseum
Synthetic Biology--You are There
Manimals, Sticklebacks, and Finches
Jakob the Hobbit?
Grandma Manimal
Hominids for Clinical Trials--The Paper
The Neanderthal Genome Project Begins