Check out IdeaFlow by Renee Hopkins Callahan for the latest on innovation trends and practices. On her radar screen: the creativity of bipolar children, Democrats' call for an "Innovation Agenda", grocery store innovations, creating a culture of business experimentation, and more.
Spend less time traveling and more time selling with GoToMeeting. Hold instant Web conferences in just a few clicks.
Free 30-day trial.
I am happy to announce the launching of a series of interviews I am conducting for Corante called the Future of Digital Media:
The Future of Digital Media is a two-month series, sponsored by Orb, that explores how the empowerment of the consumer over his or her media experience, coupled with the technological innovation that's broadly democratizing media creation, is leading to a revolution in the way people access, consume, share and remake content.The first interview, with Jeff Jarvis, is here: The Future of Digital Media: Jeff Jarvis.Through interviews with leading commentators and cutting edge practioners, the Future of Digital Media examines the social, legal and economic impacts of this disruptive and revolutionary change.
Need I say ... read the whole thing.
Ernie the Attorney notes that TiVo has adopted a new capability that they should have adopted long ago (TIVO now has permalinks):
So now TIVO lets bloggers create links to so that people who use the web programming feature can quickly program their TIVOs. Here's the concept. Let's say I want to recommend that you watch Meet the Press tomorrow (which is what Rick Klau is doing). I can post a reference to the show and the time, but now I can also create a hyperlink that allows TIVO owners to click on the link and immediately be brought to a screen where they can program their TIVO (via the Internet) to record that show. Apparently, TIVO adopted this idea at the urging of blogger George Hotelling. [links in original]When will there be playlist capability? How about a one-click network schedule (for the Ernie Miller channel)?
Of course now that TiVo has provided the capability, will the networks be smart enough to promote it? Perhaps the networks realize that if you start encouraging people to share their viewing habits and recommend things to friends, pretty soon they will want to actually share video with their friends and we can't have that now, can we?
Okay, so I'm in the Podcasting session at Bloggercon and a fellow named Kieran made a very cool suggestion as a possible market for podcasts: videogames.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, like previous games in the series, includes the most realistic radio simulations of any game. There is even a roundtable discussion of violence on a faux-talk show. So why not download podcasts that you can select in GTA's radio?
Sounds cool to me. What other games could benefit from podcasts?
As excited as I am about podcasting (and broadcatching) (and, heck, I podcast myself and will be doing even more in the near future), I think it is important to note one of the significant limitations of the medium.
I can read dozens, if not more, blogs every morning (thank you, aggregator!). Depending on their length, I can only listen to a handful of audio shows everyday. This means that my attention is much more scarce with regard to podcasts than blogging. This, I believe, is going to have important effects with regard to the audience and producers of podcasting.
This attention scarcity is particularly true for the talk shows (such as IT Conversations), as opposed to music shows. The reason is that talk shows really demand attention. It is very difficult to read or perform work while listening to a talk show, whereas music goes really well in the background.
What are some of the likely effects of this? Here are some of my initial speculations, there are probably more differences and I will most likely be quite wrong on some of them:
Comments, thoughts, etc. Greatly appreciated.
I've written about the iPod platform before (Broadcatching on the iPod Platform). Indeed, I started an audio program to take advantage of it: The Importance of ... Law and IT.
The idea is clearly catching on quickly.
Doc Searls has some interesting things to say about the concept (DIY radio with PODcasting):
Since the Net and the Web came along in the early and mid-90s, I've had a growing impatience with waiting around for stuff on the radio I might care about. Another way to look at it: All radio, commercial and noncommercial, including what we call the "content", was turning into the same kind of stuff-to-endure as the advertising and promotional announcements that paid for it.Good stuff.But now most of my radio listening is to what Adam Curry and others are starting to call podcasts. That last link currently brings up 24 results on Google. A year from now, it will pull up hundreds of thousands, or perhaps even millions.
UPDATE 1430 PT
Dan Gillmor jumps on the bandwagon (iPodding, and Why it Matters):
I've been increasingly blown away by the potential of what Adam Curry, Dave Winer and others are thinking about -- and now doing -- with Web audio. The word for this is "podcasting," delivering audio to MP3 players like the iPod. I'm working on a column about the genre, but if you're interested you should read this explainer by Doc Searls. This is going to be a big deal, sooner than you think.Yep.
As Searls notes, there are going to be legal challenges to the companies that begin to put this all together because it will challenge traditional broadcasting. Too bad the legal challenges are already squelching the television equivalent.
These past few days there has been a great deal of excitement about a report in Newsweek that TiVo and Netflix would be joining together to deliver downloadable movies (I Want a Movie! Now!). See also, C|Net News' more nuanced take: Picture imperfect for Netflix, TiVo.
My response? Yawn.
Wake me up when TiVo provides an open interface for downloading video content via the internet (preferably via RSS w/ BitTorrent Enclosures).
There are no details as both companies are being quite reticent and, apparently, the "done" deal is really only nearly done, and nearly done is not quite the same as actually done. Still, what this sounds like is a closed system. You can get the content that TiVo and Netflix choose (or are permitted) to license for you. It will be a wonderful selection (maybe) but that isn't going to really revolutionize things too much. Really, how much different is this service than TiVo combined with pay-per-view?
The internet doesn't offer exciting possibilities because it is a closed network where only the major content providers are allowed to offer information. Where would the internet be if you could only get information from the usual list of suspects? You wouldn't be reading this blog, for one.
So, TiVo plus Netflix would be nice. But so would Movielink, CinemaNow, Starz and all the other internet movie download services. TiVo adds easy connection to the television, but others will soon offer that too.
What will be exciting is connecting the television to any video content on the internet - broadcatching is when things get interesting.
What is Hatch's Hit List? Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) has introduced the Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act (IICA, née INDUCE Act) in the Senate. The bill would make it illegal to "intentionally induce" copyright infringement, but is worded so broadly that it would have all sorts of unintended consequences, one of which is to severely limit, cripple or kill innovation in many different fields. Hatch's Hit List is a daily exploration of some of the technologies and fields that the bill would likely affect. See also, Introducing Hatch's Hit List and the Hatch's Hit List Archives. Send list suggestions to ernest.miller 8T aya.yale.edu.
Today on Hatch's Hit List: Broadcatching
Combine RSS (w/enclosures) with BitTorrent and you get what I call "broadcatching." It is, in my view, a revolutionary method for multimedia publishing and distribution without gatekeepers.
Problem is, like email and http and ftp and p2p, anyone can post any sort of content in the enclosures and easily distribute it. In fact, undoubtedly, broadcatching will be used by many for infringement. People will share their favorite (and copyrighted) television programs and movies with others. And, if the RSS is private (aka a "darknet"), how will the RIAA or MPAA be able to find and punish the infringers?
The tools for using broadcatching will undoubtedly encourage people to use them for illicit purposes, such as with instructions that "any large file could be put into an enclosure" or something similar.
Clearly, the whole broadcatching thing is going to have to be strictly regulated. Perhaps we can require that all RSS feeds be registered, so that they can be monitored? Broadcatching software will definitely need dialog boxes that ask if the user is sure they want to add content to an enclosure, as it might be copyrighted. Newsreaders will need dialog boxes that ask subscribers whether they want to download the enclosures (they might be copyrighted).
Because broadcatching is a direct and immediate threat to the business models of Hollywood, it will certainly be a prime target for any lawsuits Hollywood can throw against it.
Want to know more about the INDUCE Act?
Please see LawMeme's well-organized index to everything I've written on the topic, including Hatch's Hit List: The LawMeme Reader's Guide to Ernie Miller's Guide to the INDUCE Act.
Fascinating study on TiVo use by consumers from Forrester Research (Forrester Research Conducts In-Depth Survey of DVR Users to Uncover Key Trends Impacting the Television and Advertising Industries). Some of the key findings are quite interesting:
DVRs have a significant impact on consumers' TV viewing habits.So, some types of commercials are popular, others are not. How about that? I guess car dealers are going to have to get more creative.-- While real-time viewing drops by 60 percent for consumers who use DVRs, programs like the evening news and sporting events are among the programs that retain significant real-time viewing.
-- Forrester's survey respondents report watching only 8 percent of commercials in recorded programming. Three out of 10 viewers say they watch no commercials at all.
-- Although the numbers paint a gloomy picture for advertisers, viewers do not treat all ads equally. Three out of four DVR users watch some ads at least occasionally. Movie ads and promos for upcoming programming fare best. Conversely, consumers watch less than one in 10 ads about credit cards, long-distance carriers, car dealers, and banks.
Other findings include the fact that delayed viewing for time-sensitive programming (such as sports and news) doesn't drop nearly as much as other programming. Well, duh. Still, sometimes the obvious needs to be stated.
Lost Remote makes a bold claim and is nearly right (TheKnot and Comcast's marriage):
Your life changed last week. If you work in TV or on the web, your work life changed immeasurably. If you're a TV or web user, it changed nearly as much. Why? TV stations are now unneccessary.Absolutely, and there is much more insightful analysis, but the problem I see with this is that it still leaves the cable company as a gatekeeper. True broadcatching bypasses such gatekeepers. I also don't really see cable companies opening up their services to all comers, as it would likely undermine their existing subscription models and relationships with major content producers. See, also, 500 Channels with Nothing On? Nah - No Channels At All.Comcast and wedding website TheKnot.com have announced a new V.O.D.-only channel that will feature programming from The Knot on Comcast's digital cable.
So what?
So with one move, a website becomes a TV channel - without the messy (and expensive) need for a television station or churning out 24 hours-a-day of fresh programming. No more "feeding the beast" of all-day, all-night cable. They can put up what they have, and swap out the shows people aren't watching. [emphasis in original]
Still, this is an important article to read and an important experiment to keep an eye on. Check out the comments too.
Read on for many other links and etc...
Continue reading "Broadcatching Roundup - TV Stations Now Unnecessary and Other News"
Lots from Adam Curry today. First, he points to a couple of new domain registrations that would be of interest (RSS Progress?):
http://rssporno.com/
http://rsspornfeeds.com/
Neither has content right now and it is sort of hard to figure out who is behind them, exactly, but worth keeping track of probably. I definitely think that porn has a lot of potential as content for broadcatching - it might just be broadcatching's first killer app (RSS, BitTorrent, Broadcatching, Porn, Business Models, and Banned Music).
Curry also sees a lot of potential for broadcatching for people with disabilities (iPodder Opportunity):
It wouldn't surprise me if there were some grants waiting to be tapped for technological improvements for media distribution for peopel with disabilities. Nice that everyone can benefit from these improvements. [emphasis in original]I completely agree that there is a great deal of potential here. Curry also points to Assistive Media, a group that could really take advantage of broadcatching, I think.
The mission of Assistive Media is to heighten the educational, cultural, and quality-of-living standard for people with disabilities and help achieve independence and become better integrated within the mainstream of society and community life in general. Assistive Media accomplishes this by providing free-of-charge, copyright-approved, high caliber audio literary works to the world-wide disability community via the Internet effectively, inexpensively, and efficiently.
Finally, Curry points to an article in The Inquirer concerning iPodder (Ipodder good fodder for MP3 heads)
This is a creative synthesis of three different technology pieces. MP3, the oldest piece, can be used to record just about any audio source, from music files to radio programs and other audio content. RSS, a "lightweight XML format," has been kicking around for a while as a way to syndicate/distribute headlines and other web content (i.e. like MP3s) between sites, as well as between web sites and end-users. Finally, the iPod is the hip little device that Apple is selling like mad.The author is pessimistic, however, believing that Curry is an unfortunate number of years ahead of the curve. I agree he is ahead of the curve, but that is a good thing. Sure, the major media doesn't really understand what is going on, but that will keep them from screwing it up from the beginning. Remember "Active Channels" (RSS + BitTorrent Roundup - Broadcatching Isn't MS Active Channels)?Basically, people now have a new way to get things to listen to on their iPods, and more importantly have those things automatically delivered to their desktop computers on a regular basis through RSS. To date, when people want to get new songs or other audio files for their iPod, they have to go hunting for them. The iPodder program allows you regular subscriptions to favorite programming. For example, Mr. Curry is distributing "The Source Code," his daily 15 to 25 minute pontifications on desktop technology in MP3 format via RSS. Anyone with a favorite "voice" or radio show distributed on a regular basis that is packed into MP3 and distributed into RSS can now get those "shows" loaded.
Over on Darknet, JD Lasica points out a Barron's article that points out some of the more glaring weaknesses of traditional radio and glimmers of the future (The death of radio):
Across the country, listeners are changing how they choose to receive music and news and talk radio. They are turning to portable music players like Apple Computer's iPod, streaming audio over the Internet and the emerging field of satellite radio to hear what they want, when they want to hear it.Of course, as broadcatching develops there will be numerous debates about many of the details, and Lucas Gonze gets into one of those debates (RSS Enclosures and Playlists):
On my point "It causes users to download big files that they will never listen to or watch, creating pointless overload on web hosts," Dave says: "This is not a criticism of enclosures per se but of using aggregating enclosures on a feed where you don't want all the files. I'm aggregating 8 feeds now with get_enclosures, and all of them are ones with a high probability that I want to listen to everything."If you're interested in some of the details of future broadcatching implementation, be sure to read the whole thing.But you, the subscriber, have no control over whether there are enclosures. If some third party puts an enclosure in their feed it
makes no difference to you, and a reasonably popular third party can easily DoS a host. RSS is a blunt instrument. Once people subscribe to a feed they let the bot do the work -- if there are enclosures involved, it doesn't make subscribers more attentive.I blogged a proposal that auto-download via enclosures should require an opt-in from the provider site on 8/18. The other solution that I know of is swarming a la BitTorrent, but that requires the rights holder to have allowed redistribution, which is fairly rare. On a large scale, the answer is up to the rights holder: either they don't care about the cost of hosting or they allow redistribution in order to cover the cost. Take your pick, there are no other options. [link in original]
For months now I have been touting the possibilities of RSS and BitTorrent, aka broadcatching, especially in regard to the distribution of video. However, audio is also an important distribution medium and there is plenty of opportunity to replace radio with broadcatching as well as television.
Adam Curry has been leading the way in broadcatching audio, providing a daily 15-20 minute audio program, Source Code, on what he (borrowing the term from Steve Gillmor) calls the iPod Platform.
Making MP3s available is easy. What is hard right now is getting those MP3s effortlessly onto other platforms, such as the iPod. Imagine being able to plug your iPod into its cradle at night and pick it up in the morning full of all sorts of audio goodness, or finding the latest news already downloaded into your car for the commute to work. That is part of the idea behind Curry's iPodder.
One of the companies that is taking advantage of the RSS method of distribution for audio is IT Conversations and recently they hosted an interview with famed innovator Dan Bricklin (Dan Bricklin - Memory Lane). Over on his blog, Bricklin talks about his interview and the great potential of this new media form (Interview by Halley on ITConversations and thoughts on online stored audio):
With this form of content there is no time slot to fill or miss as there is with traditional radio/TV broadcast. Word of mouth, blogs, and search engines can help build up an "audience" for a particular "episode" after the fact without needing to worry about how many people are tuned in at a particular time. A narrow-interest piece (in hindsight) only costs the production expenses and not wasted distribution since storage is cheap and bandwidth is mainly spent on popular pieces. Something less popular doesn't preclude something else that may be more popular in the same "time slot". A "hit" can last a long time. Digital music players (especially those with large storage capacities) make it easy to carry and save content for whenever you have time to listen, even days or weeks later. Being stored, you can pause the playback, repeat, listen in small chunks of time, etc. Because it can be done when mobile, listening to content that isn't really worth devoting scarce, sit-down, quality time (such as my interview) can be mixed with other activities compatible with listening, such as traveling, exercising, or doing household chores. Being available online, you can recommend a particular piece to others after listening.Excellent thoughts - read the whole thing.
In any case, I should note that I've become so enamored of this new media format that I've decided to start my own show, generously hosted by IT Conversations. More on the first episode in another post.
Once again, I've been remiss in keeping up with all the information out there, but here are some of the more recent and interesting links.
Salon (subscription or watch an ad) has a story that explains the benefits of broadcatching quite well (Must-download TV). An excellent introduction to the subject. PVR Blog has some interesting comments on the article (BitTorrent and RSS):
Media demand is global but the content providers have yet to develop a business model to effectively provide that media to a global audience, and thus the lovers of the content have to "break laws" to watch their favorite shows. It is, as the hackneyed phrase goes, "a lose-lose" (in the sense that the content providers perceive that demand as theft and the content viewers often cannot get what they want when they want it legally.)I agree. This should be win-win.
KTYP has produced an RSS feed for broadcast television (Bootleg RSS: TV Edition). Due to popular demand the feeds are not currently available, but should be back soon. This is a no-brainer for television broadcasters who have a clue.
The New York Times has an article on several of the movie download website (An Online Supplier for Your Desktop Cineplex). The article fails to note concepts like RSS support, P2P downloading or being able to shift from PC to television. In other words, the article is clueless.
Marc Canter has a couple of links to stories about TiVo and Strangeberry, a startup TiVo acquired earlier this year (TiVO and Strangeberry). Details aren't exactly clear, but there Strangeberry might include some broadcatching functionality. I would definitely be interested in learning more.
Poynter.org has a tantalizing reference to a recent study on the potential for video-via-internet, what the study calls "Internet Bypass" (The Changing Economics of Internet Video). via Technology360
Telepocalypse has a very interesting meditation on the future of TiVo that provides some insight into the future of broadcatching as well (Internet didn't kill the video star). Well worth reading.
The Internet Archive now has more than 300 feature films available (Internet Archive: Feature Films). Who will be the first to combine these with an RSS/Broadcatch feed for MythTV?
As usual Lucas Gonze has a number of interesting posts that concern broadcatching (vBlog Central to www: go away):
Over on the nascent vBlog Central video blog hosting service, a vogger can have anything they might dream of except to be watched, because entries don't have URLs. The HTML has a URL, but the video URL is not only obscured, it's a one-use ID designed to prevent direct linking.Gonze also notes that CBS News has adopted playlists for their news pieces (CBS News implements playlists). Imagine if they used an opensystem that anyone could create playlists with and could include other news sources.This makes it impossible to use vBlog videos in playlists, to make mashups, to point into them using start and stop times (and thus make them accessible to search engines), and to take advantage of the lazy web. It seems perfectly reasonable for any one video blogger to embrace those restrictions, but to do it for many or most of them will damage video blogging as a whole.
One other post from Gonze, but you really should subscribe to his RSS feed (TiVo-like system for aggregated web-based compressed audio data).
Finally, JD Lasica touches on some broadcatching issues in the Industry Standard (Ready for the visual Web?).
I haven't been posting all that much about broadcatching (aka RSS + BitTorrent) lately, not because there isn't anything going on, but because there has been so much going on. I also like my posts to be comprehensive and make additional connections, so I just haven't jumped back into the fray. Nevertheless, here is just a small sampling of relevant articles from the past few days.
The New York Times reports on increasing experiments with non-traditional commercial formats (Breaking the 30-Second Barrier). What is particularly interesting is the growing phenomena of "short films" aka "long commercials" aka "micro movies." These are commercials that stretch anywhere from 30+ seconds to several minutes. These are commercials, to be sure, but they are also creative and interesting enough to be content as well. People will watch them (once, generally) because they are interesting, not because they are trying to sell a product. This sort of commercial doesn't really fit into the traditional broadcast format. There are experiments, of course, but really distributing such content effectively will require broadcatching. So, I'm excited to see this development.
PlaNetwork Journal carries an article by Drazen Pantic of Unmediated.org on the development and advent of broadcatching (Anybody Can Be TV: How P2P Home Video will Challenge The Network News). The article is nice introduction to the basic ideas, a short history, potential (and difficulties). A good way to get started on the debate.
The Mercury News runs a piece on the a la carte cable debate and argues that internet distribution is the only real way to create real competition (Forget a la carte cable idea; the future is in Internet TV). Ultimately, yes. However, until then, I believe that we should deny content providers from forcing bundling on the cable companies (and not force the cable companies to give up bundling). See, FCC Requests Comments on a la Carte Cable Subscriptions.
Broadcasting & Cable reports that the WB's Jack & Bobby series ("An eccentric single mother raises two teen boys, one of whom is destined to be president of the United States") will premiere as a commercial-free broadband download before being broadcast (You’ve Got TV). This promotion is taking place in partnership with AOL, but I don't see why other television series don't give this sort of promotion a try via broadcatching.
Canon has just announced their brand new prosumer digital camcorder, the XL2. Read the press release: Canon's Hotly Anticipated XL2 Three CCD Mini-DV Camcorder Sizzles this Summer. Why is this important? Why am I blogging about it? Very simply, this is yet more evidence of the democratization of content creation. The XL2 would have been a professional rig just a few years ago. Now it is at the top end of the consumer market and the capabilities will inevitably trickle down. Of course, the quality content will need some way to be distributed *cough*broadcatching*cough*.
This is what Gizmodo has to say about the capabilities of the new camcorder (Canon Announces the XL2):
With both 16:9 and 4:3 aspect ratios (film-like and TV-like, respectively), variable frame rates (again, to more closely emulate film or TV), interchangeable lens (the same as the XL1S had, including a new 20x optical zoom lens), and more, all wrapped around a 3 CCD system for maximum image, you know, fantasticness. [emphasis in original]And all for an expected market price of about $5,000. High production values content creation is becoming cheap, rapidly.
There's just so much to this camera, though, it's sort of hard to explain. Things like the ability to sync up the settings on two different cameras so that the film quality will remain identical make the XL2 the next logical choice for not only budding film-makers and home users who want the best, but increasingly, well, anyone. [emphasis added]
See also, Engadget: Canon’s new XL2 Mini-DV camcorder.
UPDATE
I would be remiss if I didn't point you to HD for Indies, a blog dedicated to "High Definition Video for Independent Filmmakers: A How To Guide for indies on the cheap." For example, check (no permalink available currently) the July 01 posting on "Tight Budget 720p Uncompressed HD Editing System Recommendation." You too can edit 720p uncompressed for $3368.
The American Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria, New York is an incredible museum and resource. It "is the only institution in the United States dedicated exclusively to the study of film, television, and digital media, and to examining their impact on American culture and society." In addition to the permanent collection of over 100,000 moving image artifacts, it has some fantastic temporary exhibits currently, such as a collection of Tim Burton's drawings from 12 of his movies. There is also an ongoing exhibit on videogames. In fact, admission to the museum provides you three tokens to play classic games including: Asteroids (1979), Frogger (1981), Ms. Pac-Man (1982), Space Invaders (1979), and Tron (1982). Additionally, the online exhibit Computer Space lets you download an emulator and the actual ROM for many of the games so that you can play them on your PC at home. You can download the original games! How cool is that?
Answer: very. Unfortunately, downloading the content from AMMI's latest exhibit is prohibited. Which is really a shame, because while the exhibit is excellent (really, really excellent), making the content freely downloadable could be very useful for our democracy. It's that important. Read on...
Continue reading "The Living Room Candidate - Not a Creative Commons"
Robert Greenwald, an honored (and innovative) director and producer of films, has a new documentary coming out that critiqes Fox News, called OutFOXed. The New York Times Magazine has a lengthy article on many of the issues facing the making of this documentary, most prominently the copyright clearance issues (which are particularly difficult for films) (How to Make a Guerrilla Documentary).
Obviously, the documentary will feature many clips from Fox News, often showing them in a less than flattering light. Fox News famously sued over the title of Al Franken's book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. The case was laughed out of court, but it shows how litigous Fox News is willing to be. So, Greenwald is rightfully afraid that he will be sued, despite the merits of his case. Fortunately, it seems that perhaps Fox News has learned its lesson (their lawsuit helped publicize Franken's book better than anything). According to the Washington Post (annoying reg. req.) Fox News may ignore this documentary (though the statement certainly isn't a promise not to sue) (Too Late to Comment?):
"People steal our footage all the time," says Dianne Brandi, Fox News's vice president for legal affairs. "We generally sort of look the other way."
Nevertheless, there have already been other significant copyright problems, according to the NY Times Magazine article:
Then there was the fact that several major news organizations were unexpectedly refusing to license their clips. (Such licensing is ordinarily pro forma.) CBS wouldn't sell Greenwald the clip of Richard Clarke's appearance on ''60 Minutes,'' explaining that it didn't want to be associated with a controversial documentary about Murdoch. WGBH, the Boston PBS station, wouldn't let Greenwald use excerpts from ''Frontline'' for fear of looking too ''political,'' it said.
An aside: Of course, why use copyright law if there are other means to prevent the making of these sorts of films. Take, for example, the process Greenwald used to make the film:
''Outfoxed'' was made in an unusually collaborative fashion. In January, Greenwald rigged up a dozen DVD recorders and programmed them to record Fox News 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for about six months.Fortunately, Greenwald didn't have to deal with the broadcast flag, which would make using such clips significantly more difficult (and expensive).
Another critical aspect to note about Greenwald's film is the innovative distribution methods he uses, bypassing traditional gatekeepers:
Last year, Greenwald followed up that effort with ''Uncovered,'' his critique of the Bush administration's case for war in Iraq, which featured interviews with former intelligence analysts, weapons inspectors and Foreign Service officers. Once the film wrapped, Greenwald turned the traditional distribution model on its head. Rather than taking the time-consuming route of entering film festivals or courting theater distributors, he sold the DVD of ''Uncovered'' through the Web sites of various left-liberal organizations: MoveOn, The Nation magazine, the Center for American Progress and the alternative-news Web sites AlterNet and BuzzFlash.Through such means he has sold tens of thousands of DVDs. This is no mean feat and it shows the power of alternative distribution. After all, what conventional distributor would be willing to publish such an obvious lawsuit target?
Another aside: The people behind the film recognize the potential for even more innovative distribution.
Jim Gilliam, a 26-year-old former dot-com executive and a producer of ''Outfoxed,'' is enthusiastic about the way Greenwald's projects meld grass-roots politics with the culture of the Internet. He predicts a future -- augured by events like MoveOn's competition for the best 30-second anti-Bush advertisement -- in which young political filmmakers will be as likely to wield a camera phone as a digital camera. ''It won't be long before people will be shooting and editing short documentaries that they'll stream from their blogs,'' he says.Yep. Sounds like broadcatching.
Luckily, given all the major legal issues involved, Greenwald has Ubercyberlaw Prof Larry Lessig and others working with him on the copyright issues (outfoxed). Says Lessig,
As the Times article describes, Greenwald’s style for distributing documentaries may be the beginning of something new — political criticism, using interviews and clips, making a strong political point, distributed through DVDs and political action groups. (See some other examples here). On what theory does he, and others, have the right to use such material without permission? On the free culture theory we call the First Amendment: Copyright law must, the Court told us in Eldred, embed “fair use”; “fair use” is informed by First Amendment values; the values of the First Amendment most relevant here are those expressed in New York Times v. Sullivan. As with news-gathering, critical political filmmaking needs a buffer zone of protection against the overreaching of the law. And if the potential of this medium — now liberated by digital technology — is to be realized, we need clear precedents that establish that critics have the freedom to criticize without having to hire a lawyer first. [links in original]Indeed. Lessig's right:
Watch the movie. Celebrate the freedom it represents. It is a particularly American freedom that we should celebrate and practice more often.
A couple of weeks ago Eric Harrison wrote a head-to-head comparison of Windows Media Center Edition and TiVo. (TiVo versus Media Center Edition PC's - finally!). TiVo won, partly because the original Windows machine had all sorts of defects, but mostly because TiVo is a more solid performer. Paul Robichaux's comparison goes into more depth about the MCE (Media Center Eye for the TiVo Guy).
Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg looks at Harrison's comparison and adds some thoughts of his own, as JR is working on a report on standalone DVRs (Tivo comparison to Windows Media Center):
First, the PC is more flexible. If I want to store and view my pictures, music and other video content, burn to DVD, copy to a portable media player and stream that content to other devices in my home, I can do that with the PC and not with the TiVo. The MCE EPG is also more flexible. Try and record the West Wing on TiVO, just the 7pm episodes shown on channel 44, not the other boradcasts. You can't do it. It's a snap on MCE. (why would you want to? to record a series according to airdates so you can watch the episodes in order). On the other hand, my TiVO never crashed, locked up, missed a scheduled record or any other annoying issue. Clearly the dedicated funcitonality makes for a more stable platform. Part of the MCE experience issue is that it's still a PC. You still need to exit to the shell to get some things done. You need to re-boot from time to time. If MCE is going to make inroads in the next year it needs to be able to shed the PC experience and live 24/7 as a consume electronics device.Here are my thoughts. I already have a TiVo. I already have a PC. Most of the people who are considering buying a TiVo already have a PC as well. If the TiVo could simply talk to the PC, then they (and I) could get the benefits of consumer electronics reliability and the flexibility of a PC without having to buy a whole new, rather expensive PC.
So why don't DVRs offer this flexibility? They get sued into oblivion: EFF Archives: Newmark v. Turner Broadcasting System. Need I mention that the IICA (née INDUCE Act) will make bringing such company-resource-draining lawsuits easier? Or that, in a little less than a year, the government will burden such capability with mandatory DRM: Digital Television Liberation Front?
Yesterday, MediaPost reported that for the first time since it has been tracked, the number of receivable television channels per household has stopped increasing and even decreased a bit (Universe Collapses: Well, TV's, Anyway):
Average Number Of TV Channels ReceivableTV executives are, of course, worried about this development and want Nielsen to look into reasons for the decline.
1985 18.8
1990 33.2
1995 41.1
2000 74.6
2001 89.2
2002 102.1
2003 100.4
I think the reasons should turn out to be pretty obvious. The "channel" concept as currently used on television has enormous search and mental transaction costs. Think about it. Imagine if the internet had to be accessed through "channels." Couldn't be done. Heck, one of the main reasons RSS is taking off is because it provides much better access to numerous sources of information. I'd never be able to keep track of as many blogs as I do if I had to do click through each like a channel.
The article notes that:
Still others think we've already reached a "channel-less" era of television, brought on by digital video recorders, where viewers essentially record and watch programming from their hard drives detached of the channels that originally televised them.See, here's the thing. DVRs haven't had enough market penetration to make that big a difference in the numbers. These numbers have very little to do with DVRs, I think. What they do point out are the limits of the current television interface known as "channels." Even if there were no DVRs, I think channel reception would naturally peak out simply because people would find very little utility in dealing with the search costs of so many "channels."
More importantly, what this quote fails to capture (and television executives can't see) is that DVRs should ultimately lead to an increase in the number of programs available, as smaller markets can easily be served through broadcast at times when TiVo can capture the broadcast, but no one is physically watching at 3 in the morning. DVRs = more programs, fewer channels. The channel concept does go away, but that doesn't mean less content. It means more content more easily found.
Ultimately, of course, this all leads to the channel-less future I call "broadcatching."
Prof. Michael Froomkin had a neat little post last week about the use of highly-partisan movies to skirt campaign finance laws (Movies as a Campaign Finance Law End-Run). The basic idea is to make a partisan movie, such as Michael Moore's virulently anti-Bush film Farenheit 9/11, and then advertise the heck out of it prior to an election. The 30-sec trailers for the movie could be as effective as campaign commercials as anything the candidates and the campaigns "officially" run. As Froomkin notes, this will be a "loophole it will be next to impossible to close."
It is funny, you know. The advent of campaign finance laws have tracked closely with the advent of traditional broadcast mass media. The money is raised for massive television ad buys, not print ad buys or billboards or a whole bunch of other things. I don't think the Democrats lose sleep over the fact that the Republicans can out spend them with regard to Washington Times page buys. But what is the common solution to the television ad problem? All sorts of arcane, loophole-ridden, cynicism-increasing, lack of respect for law fomenting, First Amendment-threatening regulation of how money is to be raised and spent (basically for television advertisements).
I look at this and I'm baffled. If the problem is the need to raise lots of money to run an expensive television-ad based election campaign, maybe the problem isn't campaign finance but the durn fool way we've regulated our broadcast medium. Rather than see the problem as one of campaign finance, why don't we see the problem as one of television regulation? If the major networks weren't bottlenecks and gatekeepers for the most popular medium of all, I don't think we'd have 1/10 the problem with campaign ad buys (and the money raised) that we have now. Read on...
Lucas Gonze has a post I completely agree with regarding the origins of the term "broadcatching" (Where did the term broadcatching come from?). See also, Marc's Voice (Broadcatching).
More importantly, Gonze breaks down the difference between "RSS" and "syndication" (RSS and weblogs tag team mano a mano vs. syndication and broadcatching). I've played fast and loose with using RSS for broadcatching, letting the herd spread a bit much. Gonze flanks the cattle back into line:
The reason for the awkwardness is that RSS is about content from the creator of the RSS feed, while playlists are about deep linking to resources not owned by the linker.
Diablog connects broadcatching with the spread of broadband in Europe (Broadcatching, the future of “broadband television”). The two early posts link to articles that demonstrate that traditional broadcasters still don't get it. For example, Strategy Analytics gives bogus advice to broadcasters (Broadcasters Beware: Broadband Is Stealing Your Viewers):
TV programmers and service providers can deal with this trend by continuing to emphasise iTV services and products like Digital Video Recorders (DVRs), which can offer viewers the same kind of interactivity and personalisation associated with the Internet.
Continue reading "Broadcatching Roundup - RSS v Syndication, RSS Radio and More"
This was actually a piece I had been planning to write for some time and never quite got around to and now it seems that Jon Udell has beaten me to it (Broadcatching: the RSS-ification of television news). Udell is considering the implications of Brett Singer's television news clip playlist (News Video-Daily), which I noted last week: Video Playlists. Lucas Gonze, one of the leaders of the playlist community, also has a couple of comments on the issue: Brett Singer's comment on his collection of news video clips and Jon Udell on Brett's video playlists. In fact, Gonze points out one of the more interesting implications of "broadcatch news": the lack of a need for "chattering monkeys inserting patter between clips."
As Udell notes, television remains a very popular and important medium. It is precisely because of its importance that I think broadcatching is a critical element in democratizing media, something I also noted earlier today on Copyfight (Commercials - Rip, Mix, Post on a Website). Read on...
Continue reading "Broadcatching, the Future of Television News and the Death of Chattering Monkeys"
