Home > Brain Waves
About this author
Zack Lynch is author of The Neuro Revolution: How Brain Science Is Changing Our World (St. Martin's Press, July 2009).
He is the founder and executive director of the Neurotechnology Industry Organization (NIO) and co-founder of NeuroInsights. He serves on the advisory boards of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, the Center for Neuroeconomic Studies, Science Progress, and SocialText, a social software company. Please send newsworthy items or feedback - to Zack Lynch.
Follow me on Twitter at @neurorev
Receive by email

GUEST AUTHOR ARCHIVES
THE NEURO REVOLUTION
TNRCoverWeb120.jpg Buy on Amazon
NEUROTECH REPORT
120_NIR09cover15.jpg 2009 Industry Report Available
NEUROTECH NEWS
NEUROTECH INDEX
INDUSTRY REPORT 2008
INVESTMENT NEWSLETTERS
BLOGS I READ
HealthBlog
Neurodudes
Mind Hacks
Neuro-journalism Mill
Neurolearning
Ross Mayfield
Future Pundit
Marginal Revolution
Pat Kane
Pipeline
Virginia Postrel
Brad Delong - Econ
Business Pundit
RECENT ENTRIES

August 2011 (2)
October 2010 (1)
September 2010 (2)
July 2010 (1)
June 2010 (1)
April 2010 (1)
March 2010 (2)
February 2010 (2)
January 2010 (1)
December 2009 (3)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (4)
September 2009 (4)
August 2009 (6)
July 2009 (7)
June 2009 (7)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (3)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (5)
January 2009 (6)
December 2008 (3)
November 2008 (5)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (11)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (1)
February 2008 (6)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (4)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (8)
September 2007 (6)
August 2007 (8)
July 2007 (6)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (4)
April 2007 (5)
March 2007 (5)
February 2007 (8)
January 2007 (6)
December 2006 (6)
November 2006 (8)
October 2006 (3)
September 2006 (9)
August 2006 (8)
July 2006 (13)
June 2006 (11)
May 2006 (8)
April 2006 (11)
March 2006 (10)
February 2006 (7)
January 2006 (10)
December 2005 (6)
November 2005 (21)
October 2005 (15)
September 2005 (15)
August 2005 (12)
July 2005 (15)
June 2005 (15)
May 2005 (16)
April 2005 (3)
March 2005 (15)
February 2005 (19)
January 2005 (19)
December 2004 (8)
November 2004 (9)
October 2004 (8)
September 2004 (11)
August 2004 (11)
July 2004 (20)
June 2004 (14)
May 2004 (17)
April 2004 (21)
March 2004 (33)
February 2004 (17)
January 2004 (13)
December 2003 (17)
November 2003 (19)
October 2003 (21)
September 2003 (22)
August 2003 (15)
July 2003 (26)
June 2003 (20)
May 2003 (21)
April 2003 (24)
March 2003 (25)
February 2003 (5)



Subscribe with Bloglines
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline


Brain Waves
April 17, 2003
Neurotechnology will Define Mental DisordersEmail This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Zack

Psychiatric Times has a revealing article this month that is before its time: Dump the DSM. The DSM, short for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, is the leading resource used by mental health professionals to define mental illnesses.


In its 50-year history, the DSM has been significantly updated four times--in 1968, in 1980, in 1987, and in 1994.  The diagnoses of mental disorders contained within the DSM are made using specific criteria and are considered as reliable as those for physical medical problems.  The reality is they are not.


The problem with the DSM’s descriptions of mental illnesses is that they are top down.  By this I mean that mental disorders are defined primarily via evaluation of externally observed symptoms through the perception of the practicing psychiatrist against a checklist contained in the DSM.


As information from biochips and brain imaging technology becomes available it will be possible to diagnose mental disorders from the bottom up.  That is, from the precise neural chemical imbalances that actually exist, rather than through externally observed behaviors.  Moreover, neuroceuticals will make it possible to treat those imbalances accurately.


The DSM was a good first step, but soon it will be time to dump the DSM.




COMMENTS
Bob Collier on January 15, 2004 02:53 AM writes...

Sounds plausible, but, since most of the so-called 'mental disorders' in the DSM appear to be a figment of the APA's narrow and poorly constructed perception of human behaviour to begin with and not actually disorders in any scientific sense of that word, it seems to me that the identification through the use of biochips and brain imaging technology of any alleged "precise neural chemical imbalances" will most likely be based on politics rather than science. So no change from the DSM to look forward to, is it? Whatever you may claim to the contrary, Zack, what constitutes a 'mental disorder' will still be a matter of one neuroscientist's opinion against another's as to which chemicals are 'in balance' and which are 'out of balance'.

Permalink to Comment
Bang Boat on August 2, 2004 04:39 AM writes...

great site

Permalink to Comment
Bang Boat on August 2, 2004 04:48 AM writes...

great site

Permalink to Comment


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL:




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES