Home > Brain Waves
About this author
Zack Lynch Zack Lynch is the founder and executive director of the Neurotechnology Industry Organization (NIO) and co-founder of NeuroInsights. He serves on the advisory boards of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT,Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics, the InnerSpace Foundation, the Center for Neuroeconomic Studies and SocialText, a social software company. His book on how brain science is changing our world will be available July 2009. Please send newsworthy items or feedback - to Zack Lynch.
Receive by email

GUEST AUTHOR ARCHIVES
NEUROTECH REPORT
120_NIR_2008_Cover_120.jpg 2008 Industry Report Available
NEUROTECH NEWS
NEUROTECH INDEX
INDUSTRY REPORT 2008
INVESTMENT NEWSLETTERS
BLOGS I READ
HealthBlog
Neurodudes
Mind Hacks
Neuro-journalism Mill
Neurolearning
Ross Mayfield
Future Pundit
Marginal Revolution
Pat Kane
Pipeline
Virginia Postrel
Brad Delong - Econ
Business Pundit
Tech Central
Steven Johnson
Technorati Profile
NEURORESOURCE LINKS
Affective Computing
Journal of Bioethics
BioSpace
Bus. 2.0 Neurotech
Cerebrum
Drug Discovery World
Emotions Research
European Brain Council
Faster Cures
Neuroscience Info
Gyre-Neurotech
NIO
Neurotech market
Int'l Brain Research
Neuro-Jobs
McGovern MIT Brain Research
Neuroeconomics
Neuroethics at Penn
Neuroethics
Neuroesthetics
NeuroInsights
Neurosociety Analysis
Nobel
PharmaPortal
Play Ethic
Rutgers Memory Lab
NEWS SOURCES
Bio-IT World
BioTech Today
BusinessWeek
Corante Biotech
Discover
Economist
Forbes
Fortune
Genetic Engineering News
GenomeWeb
Human Nature
J. Neurobio Learning
J. Neuroscience
J. Complexity Psych.
Nature-Neuroscience
Nature-NeuroPharma
Nature- NeuroNews
NY Times - Science
The Scientist
Reason Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
ORGANIZATIONS
BLTC
Bionomics
CDC
Cold Spring Harbor
Center for Cognitive Liberty
Dana
Gruter Institute
Keck-UCSF
NBIC
Neuroethics at Penn
US Bioethics
NIO
NeuroInsights
NCBI
NCGR
NIH
NIMH
Neuroscience Society
Scripps Research
Pubmed
Weizmann Institute
Whitehead Institute
Mind Brain






Subscribe with Bloglines
Check out Jevon MacDonald on the "uncertain future of blogging"


Brain Waves
April 17, 2003
Neurotechnology will Define Mental DisordersEmail This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Zack

Psychiatric Times has a revealing article this month that is before its time: Dump the DSM. The DSM, short for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, is the leading resource used by mental health professionals to define mental illnesses.


In its 50-year history, the DSM has been significantly updated four times--in 1968, in 1980, in 1987, and in 1994.  The diagnoses of mental disorders contained within the DSM are made using specific criteria and are considered as reliable as those for physical medical problems.  The reality is they are not.


The problem with the DSM’s descriptions of mental illnesses is that they are top down.  By this I mean that mental disorders are defined primarily via evaluation of externally observed symptoms through the perception of the practicing psychiatrist against a checklist contained in the DSM.


As information from biochips and brain imaging technology becomes available it will be possible to diagnose mental disorders from the bottom up.  That is, from the precise neural chemical imbalances that actually exist, rather than through externally observed behaviors.  Moreover, neuroceuticals will make it possible to treat those imbalances accurately.


The DSM was a good first step, but soon it will be time to dump the DSM.




COMMENTS
Bob Collier on January 15, 2004 02:53 AM writes...

Sounds plausible, but, since most of the so-called 'mental disorders' in the DSM appear to be a figment of the APA's narrow and poorly constructed perception of human behaviour to begin with and not actually disorders in any scientific sense of that word, it seems to me that the identification through the use of biochips and brain imaging technology of any alleged "precise neural chemical imbalances" will most likely be based on politics rather than science. So no change from the DSM to look forward to, is it? Whatever you may claim to the contrary, Zack, what constitutes a 'mental disorder' will still be a matter of one neuroscientist's opinion against another's as to which chemicals are 'in balance' and which are 'out of balance'.

Permalink to Comment
Bang Boat on August 2, 2004 04:39 AM writes...

great site

Permalink to Comment
Bang Boat on August 2, 2004 04:48 AM writes...

great site

Permalink to Comment


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL:




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES