Home > Brain Waves
About this author
Zack Lynch is author of The Neuro Revolution: How Brain Science Is Changing Our World (St. Martin's Press, July 2009).
He is the founder and executive director of the Neurotechnology Industry Organization (NIO) and co-founder of NeuroInsights. He serves on the advisory boards of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, the Center for Neuroeconomic Studies, Science Progress, and SocialText, a social software company. Please send newsworthy items or feedback - to Zack Lynch.
Follow me on Twitter at @neurorev
Receive by email

GUEST AUTHOR ARCHIVES
THE NEURO REVOLUTION
TNRCoverWeb120.jpg Buy on Amazon
NEUROTECH REPORT
120_NIR09cover15.jpg 2009 Industry Report Available
NEUROTECH NEWS
NEUROTECH INDEX
INDUSTRY REPORT 2008
INVESTMENT NEWSLETTERS
BLOGS I READ
HealthBlog
Neurodudes
Mind Hacks
Neuro-journalism Mill
Neurolearning
Ross Mayfield
Future Pundit
Marginal Revolution
Pat Kane
Pipeline
Virginia Postrel
Brad Delong - Econ
Business Pundit
RECENT ENTRIES

August 2011 (2)
October 2010 (1)
September 2010 (2)
July 2010 (1)
June 2010 (1)
April 2010 (1)
March 2010 (2)
February 2010 (2)
January 2010 (1)
December 2009 (3)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (4)
September 2009 (4)
August 2009 (6)
July 2009 (7)
June 2009 (7)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (3)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (5)
January 2009 (6)
December 2008 (3)
November 2008 (5)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (11)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (1)
February 2008 (6)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (4)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (8)
September 2007 (6)
August 2007 (8)
July 2007 (6)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (4)
April 2007 (5)
March 2007 (5)
February 2007 (8)
January 2007 (6)
December 2006 (6)
November 2006 (8)
October 2006 (3)
September 2006 (9)
August 2006 (8)
July 2006 (13)
June 2006 (11)
May 2006 (8)
April 2006 (11)
March 2006 (10)
February 2006 (7)
January 2006 (10)
December 2005 (6)
November 2005 (21)
October 2005 (15)
September 2005 (15)
August 2005 (12)
July 2005 (15)
June 2005 (15)
May 2005 (16)
April 2005 (3)
March 2005 (15)
February 2005 (19)
January 2005 (19)
December 2004 (8)
November 2004 (9)
October 2004 (8)
September 2004 (11)
August 2004 (11)
July 2004 (20)
June 2004 (14)
May 2004 (17)
April 2004 (21)
March 2004 (33)
February 2004 (17)
January 2004 (13)
December 2003 (17)
November 2003 (19)
October 2003 (21)
September 2003 (22)
August 2003 (15)
July 2003 (26)
June 2003 (20)
May 2003 (21)
April 2003 (24)
March 2003 (25)
February 2003 (5)



Subscribe with Bloglines
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline


Brain Waves
March 06, 2004
Neuromarketing Not So Hot, Yet...Email This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Zack

Either corporate America doesn't believe the hype surrounding neuromarketing or their marketing departments don't understand what "neuromarketing" means. My bet it is more the latter than the former. Regardless of the reason, the lack of interest in neuromarketing caused the first neuromarketing conference to be cancelled this week:

Thank you for your interest in Neuromarketing 2004. Unfortunately, the interest expressed about this meeting exceeded the actual number of participants who signed up. This number was too small for the meeting to be economically feasible. We expect this nascent field to grow quickly, and hope to have sufficient participation to support our meeting next year.

Conference organizers had even put together an all-star group of neuroeconomic researchers that included:

-P. Read Montague, PhD - Director, Human Neuroimaging Lab, Baylor College
-Steve Quartz, PhD - Director, Social Cognitive Neuroscience Lab at Caltech
-Kevin McCabe, PhD - Prof. Economics and Law at George Mason University
-Paul Zak, PhD - Director, Center for Neuroeconomics,Claremont Graduate U.
-Brian Knutson, PhD - Assistant Prof., Psychology and Neuroscience at Stanford
-Colin Camerer, PhD - Professor of Business Economics at Caltech
-Samuel McClure, PhD - Fellow at Princeton University
-Ronald Fisher, MD, PhD - Director of Nuclear Medicine, Baylor Hospital
-Clint Kilts PhD - Vice Chair for Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences of the Emory University School of Medicine

If you really think about it, how many marketing or advertising executives do you know that have a background in neuroscience. As I've said before, as brain imaging advances, neuromarketing will become a significant growth sector in years to come as the trillion-per-year advertising and marketing industries leverage brain scanning technology to better understand how and why people react to different market campaigns. If you know any highly energetic, experience business executives with neuroscience degrees, have them give me a call. I've got a few companies that are interested in talking with them.

Update: What Brand Are You? My first brand was "Pro-Performa" which means "hitting the wall" my second was "Tenax" meaning "calm chaos collectively collaborated".


Category: Neuromarketing


COMMENTS
Rob on March 7, 2004 08:18 PM writes...

People just don't get it when it comes to neuroscience. I don't understand why. You can talk all day about studies that show humans don't make rational purchasing decisions, and people will say "hmmm, that's interesting." They never think it applies to them and it never causes them to question their own decisions in any way.

Permalink to Comment
Christine Dobbin on March 9, 2004 07:25 AM writes...

Although i can understand how neuromarketing could be used, (if marketing professionals can ever get their heads out of the consumer and status obbsessed cloud), it is not a good thing surley. Why should anyone bother to urge it forward? Is their not already enough comsumerism encouraged? Why push it? The people who are dissapointed should leave thier arguments be. Why give knowledge of such to a multinational corporation? Have you really got anything to gain? Would any amout of money account for the fact you helped brainwash millions into buying a burger? It is an unnessesary part of society which is designed to make people feel like they are lacking something personally, and if they are it can all be fixed with whatever product. I urge you, it needs no encouragement.

Permalink to Comment
Peter Kenning on March 11, 2004 05:27 AM writes...

That the Neuromarketing 2004 was cancelled is really a pitty. As an active researcher in neuroeconomics I know that the persons listed above are really excellent researchers and speakers...

However - for me it is really hard to sse, why there is so low attention on this reserach area in the US. Taking into consideration, what kind of influence just the few results of our german reserach team on the economic practice here in germany have had - espicially in marketing....

Nevertheless I wish you the best for the next conference in autum 2004. Perhaps we will see us before on the 2nd Conference on Neuroeeocnomics? For details see: www.connecs.org


Regads Peter

Permalink to Comment
Rob on March 12, 2004 04:05 AM writes...

Christine,
I think you are only seeing one side of the equation. Yes neuromarketing raises ethical issues, but it is no different than anything done now, it is just on a more focused and intense scale. But on the flip side, it is a way to maximize customer happiness by targeting the message, and isn't that what we are ultimately after?

Permalink to Comment
Becky on March 29, 2004 01:06 PM writes...

Rob,
It's nice that you can rationalize putrid, manipulative advertising techniques to make yourself feel better, but what if the customer doesn't want to deal with this kind of thing, period? Advertisements just make me feel depressed. Do you honestly think that whichever company has the ability to spend the most on the best advertisers, has the product that will make the customer happiest? How many products are useless wastes of third-world labor, gimmickry, and bright, shiny packaging with commercials and advertisements to impart a feeling to the item that is so sorely lacking? Sad, sad world we live in..

-Becky

Permalink to Comment
Ali Moazed on April 7, 2004 02:51 PM writes...

I agree that neuromarketing is a fascinating concept and seems to be the wave of the future. As such, I'm considering a career change to get on the leading edge of this technology. This would require a return to school for me. Can anyone tell me whether this would be more the focus of neuroscience or applied (marketing) psychology and whether you know of academic programs that are starting to focus on this? I'd like to approach it from the neuroscience side, but I don't want to end up doing 4 years of PhD. work followed by the usual 5 or 6 year post doc in neuroscience, before hitting the jack pot.

Thanks for your feedback.

Permalink to Comment


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL: http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1542
Neuromarketing is Not so Hot from BusinessPundit I am as disappointed as Zack is that Neuromarketing 2004 was cancelled. I think this stuff is the wave of the future, and people need... [Read More]

Tracked on March 7, 2004 08:35 PM




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES