The best way humanity has figured out how to build credible knowledge is by using the scientific method.  One key element in this process is testing the hypothesis under scrutiny.  Well-designed tests can reveal new truths, while poorly designed ones can spread false hope.  Advances in neurotechnology (from brain imaging to biochips) represent new tools that can create valuable new data for anyone performing tests centered on being human. 

I see a significant surge in the need to provide researchers across all the humanities, social and life sciences with open access to the latest advancements in neurotechnology to help test old and new hypotheses. 

To ensure sufficient capacity exists to support this research, I will be talking with many of the Gruter participants at the Sensory Systems and Judgment in Law conference this weekend about the creation of an Independent Global Neurotechnology Institute where researchers across all disciplines (especially those researchers who currently don't have access to this type of technology or who are unfamiliar with its value) will be able to compete for access to the most advanced neurotechnology.

Working in cooperation with the leading instrument makers, the IGNI will allow researchers to push the envelope of mental science. IGNI's goals include improving the quality and interrelatedness of imaging and biochip research in order to help set standards for the research community at large.

The first phase of the five year project requires a $5M endowment to: purchase the latest tools, find a smart location, support initial research grants and begin the the development of educational seminars for emerging disciplines like neuroeconomics, neurosociology and neuroaesthetics. 

The organizational model would be similar to how the Santa Fe Institute for Complex Systems research has evolved. If you are interested in learning more about the IGNI, please email me.