Corante

About this author
Zack Lynch is author of The Neuro Revolution: How Brain Science Is Changing Our World (St. Martin's Press, July 2009).
He is the founder and executive director of the Neurotechnology Industry Organization (NIO) and co-founder of NeuroInsights. He serves on the advisory boards of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, the Center for Neuroeconomic Studies, Science Progress, and SocialText, a social software company. Please send newsworthy items or feedback - to Zack Lynch.
Follow me on Twitter at @neurorev
Receive by email

GUEST AUTHOR ARCHIVES
THE NEURO REVOLUTION
TNRCoverWeb120.jpg Buy on Amazon
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Brain Waves

« Memory and Today's Tools | Main | Emotional Transaction Costs »

October 24, 2003

NeuroWar

Email This Entry

Posted by Zack Lynch

The advent of sophisticated neuroweapons that can be used for mind control, coercive truth detection or to erase memories are on the horizon. Whether they are used for national defense or for offensive purposes, national governments are spending billions of dollars each year to improve soldier performance.

In the October Global Futures Report, The Institute for Global Futures described neurowarfare as follows:

Shape shifting realities, contextual synthetic intelligence, mind morphing...if none of this sounds familiar, that's okay as NeuroWar has not been invented ---maybe. NeuroWar, the use of advanced neuroscience technology for defense is in it's embryonic stages.

What do you think about the prospect of neurowarfare?

Comments (4) | Category: Neuropolicy


COMMENTS

1. Chris Furmanski on October 25, 2003 2:20 AM writes...

Neuroweapons might be on the horizon, but being close to government-funded/military research, it seems to me that field-operable weapons are likely many decades off.

One sample roadblock to consider: distribution. Aerosol-based brain agents would likely be deemed chemical weapons which are internationally outlawed.

And while my knowledge of phrama & respiratory physiology is limited to that of a pre-med level, it seems to me that another one of the major issues with such drug-based neuroweapons would be ensuring proper dosage-levels. Examples of uncontrolled aerosol-based 'control' devices used in realistic settings have proven to be very unpredictable--- as was evidenced in the Russian siege of Muslim/Chechnyan-held Moscow theatre where seemingly understood dosage-levels of a believed opiate-(fentanyl-based?)oriented gas did not have the desired incapacitating effect (it killed many and left many others unaffected).

As an aside, I came across another magnetic-based (TMS) brain device/research project that is intended to improve soldier performance that is hardly high-tech, but certainly interesting:

http://www.musc.edu/pr/darpa.htm

Anyway, those people interested in the on-goings of defense-based research can check out DARPA's life of unclassified programs (pdf):

http://www.darpa.mil/body/pdf/FINAL2003FactFilerev1.pdf

If you are a fan of induction: keep in mind that it was DARPA (and not Al Gore) that brought us the internet, so the forces of DARPA certainly aren't always as sinister as many people would like to believe....

Permalink to Comment

2. David Weisman on October 26, 2003 1:46 PM writes...

They are horrible, amd not in the sense of being unlikely either.

Permalink to Comment

3. Casey on October 29, 2003 10:25 PM writes...

Already we can counteract the respiratory depression and death caused by fentanyl in the Russian theater (a very poorly thought out attempt at neurowarfare).

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12855812&dopt=Abstract

I'd rather see us putting cities to sleep than blowing them to bits..

Permalink to Comment

4. Chris Furmanski on October 31, 2003 12:08 AM writes...

Neat agonist finding.... I hadn't seen that....

I'm a systems-level neuroscience guy anyway, so receptor-side pharma-physiology really tends to inhibit my brainstem :) … I'd still place a wager that controlling dosage across multiple orders of magnitude for both the chemical weapon du’jour and the receptor-specific agonist is just one, of many, potential problems to chemical-based neuroweopons.

Would a 30-40 fold increase in the dosage of fentanyl + the Manke et al 5-HT4 receptor-specific agonist still be fatal?

I don’t really want to belabor this point since I only brought up Moscow as a popularized example of primitive neurowar gone bad(ly). But by extension, if simply trying to knock-out some terrorists in a closed environment went this badly (and there's lots of reasons to believe that things turned out "best-case"), trying to have widespread, profound effects on higher-level cognition, especially in the context of the current military doctrine, seems like quite an intractable problem at the moment. I certainly wouldn’t want to send my kid into secure a hostile area (or pacify friendly noncombatants, for that matter) where random doses of psychotropics were used…

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Chinese Cover of The Neuro Revolution
The Neuro Revolution Lands In China
How Neuroscience Will Change the World - My Interview on Reason.tv
Neuroscience Hearing on Capitol Hill Wednesday Sept 29, 2pm
The Neuro Revolution Published in Japan as "Neuro Wars"
Neurotech 2010: Translational Researchers Highlight Innovation
The Neuro Revolution in China Progressing
Speakers for Neurotech 2010 - Boston, May 19-20